The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 338:1896-1904 June 25, 1998 Number 26
NextNext

Rating the Appropriateness of Coronary Angiography — Do Practicing Physicians Agree with an Expert Panel and with Each Other?
John Z. Ayanian, M.D., M.P.P., Mary Beth Landrum, Ph.D., Sharon-Lise T. Normand, Ph.D., Edward Guadagnoli, Ph.D., and Barbara J. McNeil, M.D., Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Naylor, C. D.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Evaluations of the appropriateness of medical care are important to monitor the quality of care and to contain costs and enhance safety by reducing inappropriate care. Experts' views are usually incorporated into evaluations of appropriateness. However, practicing physicians may not concur with these views, and physicians' clinical backgrounds may influence their beliefs.

Methods We asked 1058 internists, family practitioners, and cardiologists in California, Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas to rate the appropriateness of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction for 20 common indications. Nine clinical experts also rated these indications using an established consensus method.

Results For 17 of the 20 indications, median ratings of surveyed physicians and the expert panel agreed within 1 unit on a 9-unit scale. Patients' older age had a negative effect on ratings by the expert panel but not on ratings by surveyed physicians. In multivariable analyses of surveyed physicians, cardiologists rated angiography as significantly more appropriate than did primary care physicians for complicated indications, and for uncomplicated indications cardiologists who performed invasive procedures gave higher appropriateness ratings for angiography than did cardiologists who did not perform such procedures and primary care physicians. For uncomplicated indications, physicians from hospitals providing coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery rated angiography as more appropriate than physicians from other hospitals. Physicians from New York and those employed by health maintenance organizations rated angiography as less appropriate than other physicians.

Conclusions Surveyed physicians agreed with clinical experts about the appropriateness of coronary angiography after myocardial infarction for most indications, indicating that well-designed expert panels can closely reflect the views of practicing physicians. Variations in beliefs among practicing physicians suggest that evaluations of medical practice should incorporate the views of a range of relevant types of physicians.


Source Information

From the Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Section on Health Services and Policy Research (J.Z.A.), and the Department of Radiology (B.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School (J.Z.A., M.B.L., S.-L.T.N., E.G., B.J.M.); and the Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health (S.-L.T.N.) — all in Boston.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Ayanian at the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Assessing the Appropriateness of Medical Care
Wassertheil-Smoller S., Tobin J., Steingart R., Hsu J., Black N., Ayanian J. Z., Shekelle P. G., Park R.E., Naylor C. D.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1478-1481, Nov 12, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.