The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 339:792-798 September 17, 1998 Number 12
NextNext

A Comparison of Four Treatments for Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus
David M. Treiman, M.D., Patti D. Meyers, M.P.A., Nancy Y. Walton, Ph.D., Joseph F. Collins, Sc.D., Cindy Colling, R.Ph., M.S., A. James Rowan, M.D., Adrian Handforth, M.D., Edward Faught, M.D., Vincent P. Calabrese, M.D., Basim M. Uthman, M.D., R. Eugene Ramsay, M.D., Meenal B. Mamdani, M.D., Pratap Yagnik, M.D., John C. Jones, M.D., Elizabeth Barry, M.D., Jane G. Boggs, M.D., Andres M. Kanner, M.D., for The Veterans Affairs Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background and Methods Although generalized convulsive status epilepticus is a life-threatening emergency, the best initial drug treatment is uncertain. We conducted a five-year randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of four intravenous regimens: diazepam (0.15 mg per kilogram of body weight) followed by phenytoin (18 mg per kilogram), lorazepam (0.1 mg per kilogram), phenobarbital (15 mg per kilogram), and phenytoin (18 mg per kilogram). Patients were classified as having either overt generalized status epilepticus (defined as easily visible generalized convulsions) or subtle status epilepticus (indicated by coma and ictal discharges on the electroencephalogram, with or without subtle convulsive movements such as rhythmic muscle twitches or tonic eye deviation). Treatment was considered successful when all motor and electroencephalographic seizure activity ceased within 20 minutes after the beginning of the drug infusion and there was no return of seizure activity during the next 40 minutes. Analyses were performed with data on only the 518 patients with verified generalized convulsive status epilepticus as well as with data on all 570 patients who were enrolled.

Results Three hundred eighty-four patients had a verified diagnosis of overt generalized convulsive status epilepticus. In this group, lorazepam was successful in 64.9 percent of those assigned to receive it, phenobarbital in 58.2 percent, diazepam and phenytoin in 55.8 percent, and phenytoin in 43.6 percent (P=0.02 for the overall comparison among the four groups). Lorazepam was significantly superior to phenytoin in a pairwise comparison (P=0.002). Among the 134 patients with a verified diagnosis of subtle generalized convulsive status epilepticus, no significant differences among the treatments were detected (range of success rates, 7.7 to 24.2 percent). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the differences among treatment groups were not significant, either among the patients with overt status epilepticus (P=0.12) or among those with subtle status epilepticus (P=0.91). There were no differences among the treatments with respect to recurrence during the 12-hour study period, the incidence of adverse reactions, or the outcome at 30 days.

Conclusions As initial intravenous treatment for overt generalized convulsive status epilepticus, lorazepam is more effective than phenytoin. Although lorazepam is no more efficacious than phenobarbital or diazepam and phenytoin, it is easier to use.


Source Information

From the Neurology Services of the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in West Los Angeles, Calif. (D.M.T., P.D.M., N.Y.W., A.H.), Bronx, N.Y. (A.J.R.), Birmingham, Ala. (E.F.), Richmond, Va. (V.P.C.), Gainesville, Fla. (B.M.U.), and Miami (R.E.R.), and the Hines Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago (M.B.M.); the Departments of Neurology of the University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles (D.M.T., N.Y.W.), Mount Sinai College of Medicine, New York (A.J.R.), the University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham (E.F.), the Medical College of Virginia, Richmond (V.P.C.), the University of Florida School of Medicine, Gainesville (B.M.U.), the University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami (R.E.R.), and the Loyola University School of Medicine, Chicago (M.B.M.); the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Perry Point, Md. (J.F.C.); and the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, N.M. (C.C.). Other authors were Pratap Yagnik, M.D. (Neurology Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Department of Neurology, Medical College of Pennsylvania — both in Philadelphia); John C. Jones, M.D. (Neurology Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine — both in Madison); Elizabeth Barry, M.D. (Neurology Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine — both in Baltimore); Jane G. Boggs, M.D. (Neurology Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Department of Neurology, Medical College of Virginia — both in Richmond); and Andres M. Kanner, M.D. (Neurology Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine — both in Madison).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Treiman at the Department of Neurology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 97 Paterson St., New Brunswick, NJ 08901-0019.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.