The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 339:1021-1029 October 8, 1998 Number 15
NextNext

A Comparison of Physical Therapy, Chiropractic Manipulation, and Provision of an Educational Booklet for the Treatment of Patients with Low Back Pain
Daniel C. Cherkin, Ph.D., Richard A. Deyo, M.D., M.P.H., Michele Battié, Ph.D., R.P.T., Janet Street, M.N., C.P.N.P., and William Barlow, Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Shekelle, P. G.
-Letters
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background and Methods There are few data on the relative effectiveness and costs of treatments for low back pain. We randomly assigned 321 adults with low back pain that persisted for seven days after a primary care visit to the McKenzie method of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, or a minimal intervention (provision of an educational booklet). Patients with sciatica were excluded. Physical therapy or chiropractic manipulation was provided for one month (the number of visits was determined by the practitioner but was limited to a maximum of nine); patients were followed for a total of two years. The bothersomeness of symptoms was measured on an 11-point scale, and the level of dysfunction was measured on the 24-point Roland Disability Scale.

Results After adjustment for base-line differences, the chiropractic group had less severe symptoms than the booklet group at four weeks (P=0.02), and there was a trend toward less severe symptoms in the physical-therapy group (P=0.06). However, these differences were small and not significant after transformations of the data to adjust for their non-normal distribution. Differences in the extent of dysfunction among the groups were small and approached significance only at one year, with greater dysfunction in the booklet group than in the other two groups (P=0.05). For all outcomes, there were no significant differences between the physical-therapy and chiropractic groups and no significant differences among the groups in the numbers of days of reduced activity or missed work or in recurrences of back pain. About 75 percent of the subjects in the therapy groups rated their care as very good or excellent, as compared with about 30 percent of the subjects in the booklet group (P<0.001). Over a two-year period, the mean costs of care were $437 for the physical-therapy group, $429 for the chiropractic group, and $153 for the booklet group.

Conclusions For patients with low back pain, the McKenzie method of physical therapy and chiropractic manipulation had similar effects and costs, and patients receiving these treatments had only marginally better outcomes than those receiving the minimal intervention of an educational booklet. Whether the limited benefits of these treatments are worth the additional costs is open to question.


Source Information

From the Group Health Center for Health Studies (D.C.C., J.S., W.B.), the Departments of Health Services (D.C.C., R.A.D.), Family Medicine (D.C.C.), Medicine (R.A.D.), and Biostatistics (W.B.) and the Center for Cost and Outcomes Research (R.A.D.), University of Washington, Seattle; and the Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (M.B.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Cherkin at the Group Health Center for Health Studies, 1730 Minor Ave., Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Physical Therapy, Chiropractic Manipulation, or an Educational Booklet for Back Pain
Pedigo M. D., Lewis C. B., Laukaitis J., Lachmann E. A., Tunkel R. S., Nagler W., Fielding M., Tyszkowski R. J., Ott S. M., Cherkin D., Street J., Deyo R., Shekelle P. G.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1999; 340:388-391, Feb 4, 1999. Correspondence

Osteopathic Treatment of Low Back Pain
Oppenheim J. S., Cherkin D., Foster D., Johnson M. D., Harrelson A., Sweetman B. J., Rogers F. J., Lyon D. A., Orlando C., Field L., Andersson G. B.J., Howell J. D.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 342:817-820, Mar 16, 2000. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.