The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 339:1516-1521 November 19, 1998 Number 21
NextNext

Primary Care Physicians' Experience of Financial Incentives in Managed-Care Systems
Kevin Grumbach, M.D., Dennis Osmond, Ph.D., Karen Vranizan, M.A., Deborah Jaffe, B.A., and Andrew B. Bindman, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Kassirer, J. P.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Managed-care organizations' use of financial incentives to influence the practice of primary care physicians is controversial. We studied the prevalence and effects of these incentives.

Methods We surveyed a probability sample of primary care physicians practicing in the largest urban counties in California in 1996. The physicians were asked about the types of incentives they encountered, the amount of income that was keyed to incentives, their experience of pressure in their practices, and the ways in which such pressure affected patient care.

Results Data were analyzed for 766 physicians involved in managed-care systems. Thirty-eight percent of these physicians reported that their arrangements with the managed-care system included some type of incentive in the form of a bonus. Fifty-seven percent of the physicians reported that they felt pressure from the managed-care organization to limit referrals (17 percent said they believed such pressure compromised patient care), and 75 percent felt pressure to see more patients per day (24 percent believed such pressure compromised patient care). The physicians who reported that their financial arrangements included an incentive based on referrals were more likely than others to have felt pressure to limit referrals in a manner that compromised care (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 5.0), and physicians with an incentive based on productivity were more likely to have felt a pressure to see more patients that they believed compromised care (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.8). The physicians whose health care systems used incentives keyed to productivity were less likely than others to be very satisfied with their practices (adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.6), whereas those whose systems included incentives related to the quality of care or patients' satisfaction were more likely to be very satisfied (adjusted odds ratio, 1.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.0).

Conclusions Many managed-care organizations include financial incentives for primary care physicians that are indexed to various measures of performance. Incentives that depend on limiting referrals or on greater productivity apply selective pressure to physicians in ways that are believed to compromise care. Incentives that depend on the quality of care and patients' satisfaction are associated with greater job satisfaction among physicians.


Source Information

From the Primary Care Research Center (K.G., D.O., K.V., D.J., A.B.B.), the Center for California Health Workforce Studies (K.G., K.V., A.B.B.), the Department of Family and Community Medicine (K.G.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (D.O., A.B.B.), University of California, San Francisco; and the Division of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital (K.V., A.B.B.) — all in San Francisco.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Grumbach at the University of California, San Francisco, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA 94143-1364.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Doctor Discontent
Cohen K. R., Fisher B. A., Etter H. S., Squillacote D. C., Kendrick R. A., Murphy E. J., Cleaveland R., Ruane T. J., Mansheim B. J., Newman R. G., Ignagni K., Grumbach K., Bindman A. B., Kassirer J. P.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1999; 340:649-653, Feb 25, 1999. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.