The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 339:1882-1888 December 24, 1998 Number 26
NextNext

A Clinical Trial of a Chest-Pain Observation Unit for Patients with Unstable Angina
Michael E. Farkouh, M.D., Peter A. Smars, M.D., Guy S. Reeder, M.D., Alan R. Zinsmeister, Ph.D., Roger W. Evans, Ph.D., Thomas D. Meloy, M.D., Stephen L. Kopecky, M.D., Marvin Allen, M.D., Thomas G. Allison, Ph.D., Raymond J. Gibbons, M.D., Sherine E. Gabriel, M.D., for The Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Newby, L. K.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Nearly half of patients hospitalized with unstable angina eventually receive a non–cardiac-related diagnosis, yet 5 percent of patients with myocardial infarction are inappropriately discharged from the emergency department. We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and cost of admission to a chest-pain observation unit (CPU) located in the emergency department for such patients.

Methods We performed a community-based, prospective, randomized trial of the safety, efficacy, and cost of admission to a CPU as compared with those of regular hospital admission for patients with unstable angina who were considered to be at intermediate risk for cardiovascular events in the short term. A total of 424 eligible patients were randomly assigned to routine hospital admission (a monitored bed under the care of the cardiology service) or admission to the CPU (where patients were cared for according to a strict protocol including aspirin, heparin, continuous ST-segment monitoring, determination of creatine kinase isoenzyme levels, six hours of observation, and a study of cardiac function). The CPU was managed by the emergency department staff. Patients whose test results were negative were discharged, and the others were hospitalized. Primary outcomes (nonfatal myocardial infarction, death, acute congestive heart failure, stroke, or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest) and use of resources were compared between the two groups.

Results The 212 patients in the hospital-admission group had 15 primary events (13 myocardial infarctions and 2 cases of congestive heart failure), and the 212 patients in the CPU group had 7 events (5 myocardial infarctions, 1 death from cardiovascular causes, and 1 case of congestive heart failure). There was no significant difference in the rate of cardiac events between the two groups (odds ratio for the CPU group as compared with the hospital-admission group, 0.50; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.20 to 1.24). No primary events occurred among the 97 patients who were assigned to the CPU and discharged. Resource use during the first six months was greater among patients assigned to hospital admission than among those assigned to the CPU (P=0.003 by the rank-sum test).

Conclusions A CPU located in the emergency department can be a safe, effective, and cost-saving means of ensuring that patients with unstable angina who are considered to be at intermediate risk of cardiovascular events receive appropriate care.


Source Information

From the Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York (M.E.F.); the Division of Emergency Medical Services and Internal Medicine (P.A.S., T.D.M.), the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (G.S.R., S.L.K., T.G.A., R.J.G.), the Section of Biostatistics (A.R.Z.), and the Section of Health Services Evaluation (R.W.E., S.E.G.), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn.; and the Division of Cardiology, Central Utah Medical Clinic, Provo (M.A.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Smars at the Division of Emergency Medical Services and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Chest-Pain Observation Units
McFalls E. O., Getchell W. S., Larsen G., Smars P. A., Farkouh M. E., Reeder G. S.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1596-1597, May 20, 1999. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.