The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 340:988-993 April 1, 1999 Number 13
NextNext

Comparison of Endoscopic Ligation and Propranolol for the Primary Prevention of Variceal Bleeding
Shiv K. Sarin, M.D., D.M., Gurwant S. Lamba, M.D., D.M., Mandhir Kumar, M.D., D.M., Alok Misra, M.D., D.M., and Nandagudi S. Murthy, Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Burroughs, A. K.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background and Methods We compared propranolol therapy and endoscopic ligation for the primary prevention of bleeding from esophageal varices. This prospective, controlled trial included consecutive eligible patients who had large varices (>5 mm in diameter) that were at high risk for bleeding. The patients were assigned to either propranolol therapy, at a dose sufficient to decrease the base-line heart rate by 25 percent, or variceal ligation, to be performed weekly until the varices were obliterated or so reduced in size that it was not possible to continue treatment.

Results Of the 89 patients, 82 of whom had cirrhosis of the liver, 44 received propranolol and 45 underwent variceal ligation. The mean (±SD) duration of follow-up in each group was 14±9 and 13±10 months, respectively. The mean time required to achieve an adequate reduction in the heart rate was 2.5±1.7 days; the mean number of sessions needed to complete variceal ligation was 3.2±1.1. After 18 months, the actuarial probability of bleeding was 43 percent in the propranolol group and 15 percent in the ligation group (P=0.04). Twelve patients in the propranolol group and four in the ligation group had bleeding. Three of the four in the ligation group had bleeding before their varices had been obliterated. Nine patients in the ligation group had recurrent varices, a mean of 3.7 months after the initial treatment. Five patients in each group died; bleeding from the varices was the cause of death of four patients in the propranolol group and of three in the ligation group. There were no serious complications of variceal ligation; in the propranolol group, treatment was stopped in two patients because of side effects.

Conclusions In patients with high-risk esophageal varices, endoscopic ligation of the varices is safe and more effective than propranolol for the primary prevention of variceal bleeding.


Source Information

From the Department of Gastroenterology, G.B. Pant Hospital (S.K.S., G.S.L., M.K., A.M.), and the Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology (N.S.M.) — both in New Delhi, India. Part of this work has appeared in abstract form (Hepatology 1997;26:360A).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Sarin at the Department of Gastroenterology, G.B. Pant Hospital, New Delhi 110 002, India, or at sksarin{at}nda.vsnl.net.in.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.