The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 340:1640-1648 May 27, 1999 Number 21
NextNext

The Association between Hospital Volume and Survival after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Patients
David R. Thiemann, M.D., Josef Coresh, M.D., Ph.D., William J. Oetgen, M.D., M.B.A., and Neil R. Powe, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Hannan, E. L.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Patients with chest pain thought to be due to acute coronary ischemia are typically taken by ambulance to the nearest hospital. The potential benefit of field triage directly to a hospital that treats a large number of patients with myocardial infarction is unknown.

Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the relation between the number of Medicare patients with myocardial infarction that each hospital in the study treated (hospital volume) and long-term survival among 98,898 Medicare patients 65 years of age or older. We used proportional-hazards methods to adjust for clinical, demographic, and health-system–related variables, including the availability of invasive procedures, the specialty of the attending physician, and the area of residence of the patient (rural, urban, or metropolitan).

Results The patients in the quartile admitted to hospitals with the lowest volume were 17 percent more likely to die within 30 days after admission than patients in the quartile admitted to hospitals with the highest volume (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.09 to 1.26; P<0.001), which resulted in 2.3 more deaths per 100 patients. The crude mortality rate at one year was 29.8 percent among the patients admitted to the lowest-volume hospitals, as compared with 27.0 percent among those admitted to the highest-volume hospitals. There was a continuous inverse dose–response relation between hospital volume and the risk of death. In an analysis of subgroups defined according to age, history of cardiac disease, Killip class of infarction, presence or absence of contraindications to thrombolytic therapy, and time from the onset of symptoms, survival at high-volume hospitals was consistently better than at low-volume hospitals. The availability of technology for angioplasty and bypass surgery was not independently associated with overall mortality.

Conclusions Patients with acute myocardial infarction who are admitted directly to hospitals that have more experience treating myocardial infarction, as reflected by their case volume, are more likely to survive than are patients admitted to low-volume hospitals.


Source Information

From the Departments of Medicine (D.R.T., J.C., N.R.P.), Epidemiology (J.C., N.R.P.), Biostatistics (J.C.), and Health Policy and Management (N.R.P.), the Program for Medical Technology and Practice Assessment (D.R.T.), and the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research (J.C., N.R.P.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Maryland HealthCare Associates, Clinton, Md. (W.J.O.); and the Delmarva Foundation for Medical Care, Easton, Md. (W.J.O.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Thiemann at Carnegie 568, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287-6568.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

The Relation between Volume and Outcome in Health Care
Sheikh K., Thiemann D. R., Coresh J., Powe N. R., Hannan E. L.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1085-1086, Sep 30, 1999. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.