The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 340:1855-1862 June 17, 1999 Number 24
NextNext

Prevention of Implantable-Defibrillator Shocks by Treatment with Sotalol
Antonio Pacifico, M.D., Stefan H. Hohnloser, M.D., John H. Williams, M.D., Ben Tao, M.Sc., Sanjeev Saksena, M.D., Philip D. Henry, M.D., Eric N. Prystowsky, M.D., for The d,l-Sotalol Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Podrid, P. J.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Patients with implantable cardioverter–defibrillators often receive adjunctive antiarrhythmic therapy to prevent frequent shocks. We tested the efficacy and safety of sotalol, a beta-blocker with class III antiarrhythmic effects, for this purpose.

Methods In a multicenter trial, patients were stratified according to left ventricular ejection fraction (<=0.30 or >0.30), randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with 160 to 320 mg of sotalol per day (151 patients) or matching placebo (151 patients), and followed for 12 months. Kaplan–Meier analyses of the time to an event were performed. Three end points were used: the delivery of a first shock for any reason or death from any cause, the first appropriate shock for a ventricular arrhythmia or death from any cause, and the first inappropriate shock for a supraventricular arrhythmia or death from any cause.

Results Compliance with double-blind treatment was similar in the two groups. There were seven deaths in the placebo group and four in the sotalol group. As compared with placebo, treatment with sotalol was associated with a lower risk of death from any cause or the delivery of a first shock for any reason (reduction in risk, 48 percent; P<0.001 by the log-rank test), death from any cause or the delivery of a first appropriate shock (reduction in risk, 44 percent; P=0.007), or death from any cause or the delivery of a first inappropriate shock (reduction in risk, 64 percent; P=0.004). Sotalol also reduced the mean (±SD) frequency of shocks due to any cause (1.43± 3.53 shocks per year, as compared with 3.89±10.65 in the placebo group; P=0.008). In the sotalol group, the reduction in the risk of death from any cause or the delivery of a first shock for any reason did not differ significantly between patients with ejection fractions of more than 0.30 and those with ejection fractions of 0.30 or less.

Conclusions Oral sotalol was safe and efficacious in reducing the risk of death or the delivery of a first defibrillator shock whether or not ventricular function was depressed.


Source Information

From the Texas Arrhythmia Institute, Houston (A.P., P.D.H.); J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany (S.H.H.); Berlex Laboratories, Montville, N.J. (J.H.W., B.T.), Eastern Heart Institute, Millburn, N.J. (S.S.); and St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis (E.N.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Pacifico at the Texas Arrhythmia Institute, 6560 Fannin St., Suite 620, Houston, TX 77030, or at apacifico{at}tmh.tmc.edu.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.