The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 340:177-183 January 21, 1999 Number 3
NextNext

Efficacy of Superovulation and Intrauterine Insemination in the Treatment of Infertility
David S. Guzick, M.D., Ph.D., Sandra Ann Carson, M.D., Christos Coutifaris, M.D., Ph.D., James W. Overstreet, M.D., Ph.D., Pam Factor-Litvak, Ph.D., Michael P. Steinkampf, M.D., Joseph A. Hill, M.D., Luigi Mastroianni, M.D., John E. Buster, M.D., Steven T. Nakajima, M.D., Donna L. Vogel, M.D., Ph.D., Robert E. Canfield, M.D., for The National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by te Velde, E. R.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Induction of superovulation with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination are frequently used to treat infertility. We conducted a large, randomized, controlled clinical trial of these treatments.

Methods We studied 932 couples in which the woman had no identifiable infertility factor and the man had motile sperm. The couples were randomly assigned to receive intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination, superovulation and intracervical insemination, or superovulation and intrauterine insemination. Treatment continued for four cycles unless pregnancy was achieved.

Results The 231 couples in the group treated with superovulation and intrauterine insemination had a higher rate of pregnancy (33 percent) than the 234 couples in the intrauterine-insemination group (18 percent), the 234 couples in the group treated with superovulation and intracervical insemination (19 percent), or the 233 couples in the intracervical-insemination group (10 percent). Stratified, discrete-time Cox proportional-hazards analysis showed that the couples in the group treated with superovulation and intrauterine insemination were 3.2 times as likely to become pregnant as those in the intracervical-insemination group (95 percent confidence interval, 2.0 to 5.3) and 1.7 times as likely as those in the intrauterine-insemination group (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 2.6). The couples in the intrauterine-insemination group and in the group treated with superovulation and intracervical insemination were nearly twice as likely to conceive as those in the intracervical-insemination group.

Conclusions Among infertile couples, treatment with induction of superovulation and intrauterine insemination is three times as likely to result in pregnancy as is intracervical insemination and twice as likely to result in pregnancy as is treatment with either superovulation and intracervical insemination or intrauterine insemination alone.


Source Information

From the University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y. (D.S.G.); Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (S.A.C., J.E.B.); University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia (C.C., L.M.); the University of California, Davis, Sacramento (J.W.O., S.T.N.); Columbia University, New York (P.F.-L., R.E.C.); the University of Alabama, Birmingham (M.P.S.); Harvard University, Boston (J.A.H.); and the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (D.L.V.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Carson at Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6550 Fannin #801, Houston, TX 77030, or at scarson{at}bcm.tmc.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Efficacy of Superovulation and Intrauterine Insemination in the Treatment of Infertility
Dickey R., Sartor S. M., Pryzak R., Habbema J.D.F., Carson S. A., Guzick D. S., Vogel D. L., te Velde E. R., Cohlen B. J.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1999; 341:128-129, Jul 8, 1999. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.