The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 341:1336-1343 October 28, 1999 Number 18
NextNext

Use of the Selective Oral Neuraminidase Inhibitor Oseltamivir to Prevent Influenza
Frederick G. Hayden, M.D., Robert L. Atmar, M.D., Margo Schilling, M.D., Casey Johnson, D.O., Donald Poretz, M.D., David Paar, M.D., Les Huson, Ph.D., Penelope Ward, M.D., Roger G. Mills, M.D., for The Oseltamivir Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Cox, N. J.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Safe and effective antiviral agents are needed to prevent infection with influenza A and B viruses. Oseltamivir (GS4104), which can be administered orally, is the prodrug of GS4071, a potent and selective inhibitor of influenzavirus neuraminidases. We studied the use of oseltamivir for long-term prophylaxis against influenza in two placebo-controlled, double-blind trials at different U.S. sites during the winter of 1997–1998.

Methods We randomly assigned 1559 healthy, nonimmunized adults 18 to 65 years old to receive either oral oseltamivir (75 mg given once or twice daily, for a total daily dose of 75 or 150 mg) or placebo for six weeks during a peak period of local influenzavirus activity. The primary end point with respect to efficacy was laboratory-confirmed influenza-like illness (defined as a temperature of at least 37.2°C accompanied by at least one respiratory and at least one systemic symptom).

Results In the two studies combined, the risk of influenza among subjects assigned to either once-daily or twice-daily oseltamivir (1.2 percent and 1.3 percent, respectively) was lower than that among subjects assigned to placebo (4.8 percent; P<0.001 and P=0.001 for the comparison with once-daily and twice-daily oseltamivir, respectively). The protective efficacy of oseltamivir in the two active-treatment groups combined was 74 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 53 to 88 percent) at all the sites combined and 82 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 60 to 93 percent) at sites in Virginia, where the rate of influenza infection was higher than the overall rate. For culture-proved influenza, the rate of protective efficacy in the two oseltamivir groups combined was 87 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 65 to 96 percent). The rate of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection was lower with oseltamivir than with placebo (5.3 percent vs. 10.6 percent, P<0.001). Oseltamivir was well tolerated but was associated with a greater frequency of nausea (12.1 percent and 14.6 percent in the once-daily and twice-daily groups, respectively) and vomiting (2.5 percent and 2.7 percent, respectively) than was placebo (nausea, 7.1 percent; vomiting, 0.8 percent). However, the frequency of premature discontinuation of drug or placebo was similar among the three groups (3.1 to 4.0 percent).

Conclusions Oseltamivir administered daily for six weeks by the oral route is safe and effective for the prevention of influenza.


Source Information

From the University of Virginia, Charlottesville (F.G.H.); Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (R.L.A.); Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk (M.S.); Pharmaceutical Research Associates, Lenexa, Kans. (C.J.); Infectious Diseases Physicians, Fairfax, Va. (D. Poretz); University of Texas, Galveston (D. Paar); Roche Global Development, Welwyn, United Kingdom (L.H., P.W.); and Gilead Sciences, Foster City, Calif. (R.G.M.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Hayden at the Department of Medicine, Box 473, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.