The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 341:468-475 August 12, 1999 Number 7
NextNext

Long-Term Clinical Efficacy of Grass-Pollen Immunotherapy
Stephen R. Durham, M.D., Samantha M. Walker, R.N., Eva-Maria Varga, M.D., Mikila R. Jacobson, Ph.D., Fiona O'Brien, M.Sc., Wendy Noble, B.Sc., Stephen J. Till, Ph.D., Qutayba A. Hamid, M.D., Ph.D., and Kayhan T. Nouri-Aria, Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Adkinson, N. F.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Pollen immunotherapy is effective in selected patients with IgE-mediated seasonal allergic rhinitis, although it is questionable whether there is long-term benefit after the discontinuation of treatment.

Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the discontinuation of immunotherapy for grass-pollen allergy in patients in whom three to four years of this treatment had previously been shown to be effective. During the three years of this trial, primary outcome measures were scores for seasonal symptoms and the use of rescue medication. Objective measures included the immediate conjunctival response and the immediate and late skin responses to allergen challenge. Cutaneous-biopsy specimens obtained 24 hours after intradermal allergen challenge were examined for T-cell infiltration and the presence of cytokine-producing T helper cells (TH2 cells) (as evidenced by the presence of interleukin-4 messenger RNA). A matched group of patients with hay fever who had not received immunotherapy was followed as a control for the natural course of the disease.

Results Scores for seasonal symptoms and the use of rescue antiallergic medication, which included short courses of prednisolone, remained low after the discontinuation of immunotherapy, and there was no significant difference between patients who continued immunotherapy and those who discontinued it. Symptom scores in both treatment groups (median areas under the curve in 1995, 921 for continuation of immunotherapy and 504 for discontinuation of immunotherapy; P=0.60) were markedly lower than those in the group that had not received immunotherapy (median value in 1995, 2863). Although there was a tendency for immediate sensitivity to allergen to return late after discontinuation, there was a sustained reduction in the late skin response and associated CD3+ T-cell infiltration and interleukin-4 messenger RNA expression.

Conclusions Immunotherapy for grass-pollen allergy for three to four years induces prolonged clinical remission accompanied by a persistent alteration in immunologic reactivity.


Source Information

From the Department of Upper Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine at the National Heart and Lung Institute, London (S.R.D., S.M.W., E.-M.V., M.R.J., F.O., W.N., S.J.T., K.T.N.-A.); the Allergy Clinic, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Service Trust, London (S.R.D., S.M.W.); and Meakins Christie Laboratories, McGill University, Montreal (Q.A.H.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Durham at the Department of Upper Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Dovehouse St., London SW3 6LY, United Kingdom, or at s.durham{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Clinical Efficacy of Grass-Pollen Immunotherapy
Østergaard M. S., Witt K., Longo G., Barbi E., Durham S. R., Walker S. M., Varga E.-M.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 342:58-59, Jan 6, 2000. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.