FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 342:1645-1650 June 1, 2000 Number 22 Next

	Full Text PDF Editorial by Steinbrook, R. Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background The news media are an important source of information about new medical treatments, but there is concern that some coverage may be inaccurate and overly enthusiastic.

Methods We studied coverage by U.S. news media of the benefits and risks of three medications that are used to prevent major diseases. The medications were pravastatin, a cholesterol-lowering drug for the prevention of cardiovascular disease; alendronate, a bisphosphonate for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis; and aspirin, which is used for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. We analyzed a systematic probability sample of 180 newspaper articles (60 for each drug) and 27 television reports that appeared between 1994 and 1998.

Results Of the 207 stories, 83 (40 percent) did not report benefits quantitatively. Of the 124 that did, 103 (83 percent) reported relative benefits only, 3 (2 percent) absolute benefits only, and 18 (15 percent) both absolute and relative benefits. Of the 207 stories, 98 (47 percent) mentioned potential harm to patients, and only 63 (30 percent) mentioned costs. Of the 170 stories citing an expert or a scientific study, 85 (50 percent) cited at least one expert or study with a financial tie to a manufacturer of the drug that had been disclosed in the scientific literature. These ties were disclosed in only 33 (39 percent) of the 85 stories.

Conclusions News-media stories about medications may include inadequate or incomplete information about the benefits, risks, and costs of the drugs as well as the financial ties between study groups or experts and pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Source Information

From the Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston (R.M., D.R.-D., C.M., S.B.S.); the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia (R.M.); the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy (L.B., K.L.), and Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine (L.B.), University of California, San Francisco; and the School of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, N.S.W., Australia (D.H.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Soumerai at the Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School, 126 Brookline Ave., Suite 200, Boston, MA 02215, or at ssoumerai{at}hms.harvard.edu.

Full Text of this Article

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Smith, M. J., Ellenberg, S. S., Bell, L. M., Rubin, D. M. (2008). Media Coverage of the Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine and Autism Controversy and Its Relationship to MMR Immunization Rates in the United States. Pediatrics 121: e836-e843 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wilson, P. M, Booth, A. M, Eastwood, A., Watt, I. S (2008). Deconstructing media coverage of trastuzumab (Herceptin): an analysis of national newspaper coverage. JRSM 101: 125-132 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mills Shaw, K. R., Van Horne, K., Zhang, H., Boughman, J. (2008). Essay Contest Reveals Misconceptions of High School Students in Genetics Content. Genetics 178: 1157-1168 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Covey, J. (2007). A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Presenting Treatment Benefits in Different Formats. Med Decis Making 27: 638-654 [Abstract]  
• (2006). Is Medical News a Friend or Foe?. DOC News 3: 22-22 [Full Text]  
• (2006). Will the Baby Boom Turn Out to Be a Health Care Bust?. DOC News 3: 13-13 [Full Text]  
• Bubela, T. M., Caulfield, T. A. (2004). Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers. CMAJ 170: 1399-1407 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S. (2004). The Media Matter: A Call for Straightforward Medical Reporting. ANN INTERN MED 140: 226-228 [Full Text]  
• Dempsey, R. (2004). The Provenance of Ideas: Constructing a Scientific Bibliography. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 20: 20-24 [Abstract]  
• Cram, P., Fendrick, A. M., Inadomi, J., Cowen, M. E., Carpenter, D., Vijan, S. (2003). The Impact of a Celebrity Promotional Campaign on the Use of Colon Cancer Screening: The Katie Couric Effect. Arch Intern Med 163: 1601-1605 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schwitzer, G. (2003). How the media left the evidence out in the cold. BMJ 326: 1403-1404 [Full Text]  
• McComas, K. A., Simone, L. M. (2003). Media Coverage of Conflicts of Interest in Science. Science Communication 24: 395-419 [Abstract]  
• Mountcastle-Shah, E., Tambor, E., Bernhardt, B. A., Geller, G., Karaliukas, R., Rodgers, J. E., Holtzman, N. A. (2003). Assessing Mass Media Reporting of Disease-Related Genetic Discoveries: Development of an Instrument and Initial Findings. Science Communication 24: 458-478 [Abstract]  
• Anorbe, E., Aisa, P., Jackson, V. P. (2003). Screening Mammography [letter] * Dr Jackson responds:. Radiology 227: 903-904 [Full Text]  
• Cassels, A., Hughes, M. A., Cole, C., Mintzes, B., Lexchin, J., McCormack, J. P. (2003). Drugs in the news: an analysis of Canadian newspaper coverage of new prescription drugs. CMAJ 168: 1133-1137 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Geiderman, J. M., Larkin, G. L. (2002). Commercial Filming of Patient Care Activities in Hospitals. JAMA 288: 373-379 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bartlett, C., Sterne, J., Egger, M. (2002). What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers. BMJ 325: 81-84 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S. (2002). News Media Coverage of Screening Mammography for Women in Their 40s and Tamoxifen for Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer. JAMA 287: 3136-3142 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M. (2002). Press Releases: Translating Research Into News. JAMA 287: 2856-2858 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Moynihan, R., Heath, I., Henry, D., Gotzsche, P. C (2002). Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering * Commentary: Medicalisation of risk factors. BMJ 324: 886-891 [Full Text]  
• Danovaro-Holliday, M. C., Wood, A. L., LeBaron, C. W. (2002). Rotavirus Vaccine and the News Media, 1987-2001. JAMA 287: 1455-1462 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Holtz, A. S., Cates, Jr, W., Rosenberg, Z., Raymond, E., Fontanarosa, P. B., Flanagin, A. (2001). When Should the Public Be Informed of the Results of Medical Research?. JAMA 286: 2944-2945 [Full Text]  
• Wells, J., Marshall, P., Crawley, B., Dickersin, K. (2001). Newspaper Reporting of Screening Mammography. ANN INTERN MED 135: 1029-1037 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chen, X., Siu, L. L. (2001). Impact of the Media and the Internet on Oncology: Survey of Cancer Patients and Oncologists in Canada. JCO 19: 4291-4297 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lee, C. W., Weir, L., Gelmon, K. A. (2001). Effect of News Media Coverage of Cancer Risk on Clinical Oncology Practice. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 1656-1657 [Full Text]  
• Stillman, F. A, Cronin, K. A, Evans, W D., Ulasevich, A. (2001). Can media advocacy influence newspaper coverage of tobacco: measuring the effectiveness of the American stop smoking intervention study's (ASSIST) media advocacy strategies. Tobacco Control 10: 137-144 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Steinbrook, R. (2000). Medical Journals and Medical Reporting. NEJM 342: 1668-1671 [Full Text]