A Comparison of Colonoscopy and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Surveillance after Polypectomy
Sidney J. Winawer, M.D., Edward T. Stewart, M.D., Ann G. Zauber, Ph.D., John H. Bond, M.D., Howard Ansel, M.D., Jerome D. Waye, M.D., Deborah Hall, M.D., J. Andrew Hamlin, M.D., Melvin Schapiro, M.D., Michael J. O'Brien, M.D., M.P.H., Stephen S. Sternberg, M.D., Leonard S. Gottlieb, M.D., M.P.H., for The National Polyp Study Work Group
Background After patients have undergone colonoscopic polypectomy,it is uncertain whether colonoscopic examination or a bariumenema is the better method of surveillance.
Methods As part of the National Polyp Study, we offered colonoscopicexamination and double-contrast barium enema for surveillanceto patients with newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. Althoughbarium enema was performed first, the endoscopist did not knowthe results.
Results A total of 973 patients underwent one or more colonoscopicexaminations for surveillance. In the case of 580 of these patients,we performed 862 paired colonoscopic examinations and barium-enemaexaminations that met the requirements of the protocol. Thefindings on barium enema were positive in 222 (26 percent) ofthe paired examinations, including 94 of the 242 colonoscopicexaminations in which one or more adenomas were detected (rateof detection of adenomas, 39 percent; 95 percent confidenceinterval, 33 to 45 percent). The proportion of examinationsin which adenomatous polyps were detected by barium enema wassignificantly related to the size of the adenomas (P=0.009);the rate was 32 percent for colonoscopic examinations in whichthe largest adenomas detected were 0.5 cm or less, 53 percentfor those in which the largest adenomas detected were 0.6 to1.0 cm, and 48 percent for those in which the largest adenomasdetected exceeded 1.0 cm. Among the 139 paired examinationswith positive results on barium enema and negative results oncolonoscopic examination in the same location, 19 additionalpolyps, 12 of which were adenomas, were detected on colonoscopicreexamination.
Conclusions In patients who have undergone colonoscopic polypectomy,colonoscopic examination is a more effective method of surveillancethan double-contrast barium enema.
Source Information
From the Departments of Medicine (S.J.W.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (A.G.Z.), and Pathology (S.S.S.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York; the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee (E.T.S.); the Departments of Medicine (J.H.B.) and Radiology (H.A.), Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis; the Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York (J.D.W.); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (D.H.); the Department of Radiology, CedarsSinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (J.A.H.); the Department of Medicine, Valley Presbyterian Hospital, Van Nuys, Calif. (M.S.); and the Mallory Institute of Pathology, Boston Medical Center, Boston (M.J.O., L.S.G.). Other authors were Walter J. Hogan, M.D. (Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee); Mansho Khilnani, M.D. (Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York; deceased); Frederick W. Ackroyd, M.D. (Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston); Joel F. Panish, M.D. (Department of Medicine, CedarsSinai Medical Center, Los Angeles); Larry Kussin, M.D. (Department of Radiology, Valley Presbyterian Hospital, Van Nuys, Calif.); and Martin Edelman, M.D. (Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Winawer at the Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021, or at winawers{at}mskcc.org.
RUBIO, C. A., HOOG, C. M., BROSTROM, O., GUSTAVSSON, J., KARLSSON, M., MORITZ, P., STIG, R., WIKMAN, O., MATTSSON, L., PALLI, D.
(2009). Assessing the Size of Polyp Phantoms in Tandem Colonoscopies. Anticancer Res
29: 1539-1545
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sung, J J Y, Lau, J Y W, Young, G P, Sano, Y, Chiu, H M, Byeon, J S, Yeoh, K G, Goh, K L, Sollano, J, Rerknimitr, R, Matsuda, T, Wu, K C, Ng, S, Leung, S Y, Makharia, G, Chong, V H, Ho, K Y, Brooks, D, Lieberman, D A, Chan, F K L, for The Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal C,
(2008). Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. Gut
57: 1166-1176
[Abstract][Full Text]
Levin, B., Lieberman, D. A., McFarland, B., Smith, R. A., Brooks, D., Andrews, K. S., Dash, C., Giardiello, F. M., Glick, S., Levin, T. R., Pickhardt, P., Rex, D. K., Thorson, A., Winawer, S. J., for the American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer,
(2008). Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin
58: 130-160
[Abstract][Full Text]
Johnson, C. D., Manduca, A., Fletcher, J. G., MacCarty, R. L., Carston, M. J., Harmsen, W. S., Mandrekar, J. N.
(2008). Noncathartic CT Colonography with Stool Tagging: Performance With and Without Electronic Stool Subtraction. Am. J. Roentgenol.
190: 361-366
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sosna, J., Sella, T., Sy, O., Lavin, P. T., Eliahou, R., Fraifeld, S., Libson, E.
(2008). Critical Analysis of the Performance of Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Detecting Colorectal Polyps >= 6 mm in the Era of CT Colonography. Am. J. Roentgenol.
190: 374-385
[Abstract][Full Text]
Saar, B, Meining, A, Beer, A, Settles, M, Helmberger, H, Frimberger, E, Rummeny, E J, Rosch, T
(2007). Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy. Br. J. Radiol.
80: 235-241
[Abstract][Full Text]
SLATER, A
(2006). Alteration in bowel habit. Imaging
18: 208-217
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pickhardt, P. J.
(2006). Utilization of the Double-Contrast Barium Enema in the Early Era of Screening CT Colonography.. Am. J. Roentgenol.
187: W661-W661
[Full Text]
Thompson, W. M., Foster, W. L., Paulson, E. K., Niedzwiecki, D., Low, V. H. S., Fulford, L. B., Broomer, B. W., Sanders, L., Rockey, D. C.
(2006). Comparison of radiologists and technologists in the performance of air-contrast barium enemas.. Am. J. Roentgenol.
187: 706-709
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kung, J. W., Levine, M. S., Glick, S. N., Lakhani, P., Rubesin, S. E., Laufer, I.
(2006). Colorectal Cancer: Screening Double-Contrast Barium Enema Examination in Average-Risk Adults Older Than 50 Years. Radiology
240: 725-735
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ferrucci, J. T.
(2006). Double-contrast barium enema: use in practice and implications for CT colonography.. Am. J. Roentgenol.
187: 170-173
[Abstract][Full Text]
Martinez, S. R., Young, S. E., Hoedema, R. E., Foshag, L. J., Bilchik, A. J.
(2006). Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance: Current Standards and Future Trends. Ann. Surg. Oncol.
13: 768-775
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rex, D. K., Kahi, C. J., Levin, B., Smith, R. A., Bond, J. H., Brooks, D., Burt, R. W., Byers, T., Fletcher, R. H., Hyman, N., Johnson, D., Kirk, L., Lieberman, D. A., Levin, T. R., O'Brien, M. J., Simmang, C., Thorson, A. G., Winawer, S. J.
(2006). Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance after Cancer Resection: A Consensus Update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.. CA Cancer J Clin
56: 160-167
[Abstract][Full Text]
Thompson, W. M., Foster, W. L., Paulson, E. K., Niedzwiecki, D., Low, V. H. S., Fulford, L. B., Broomer, B. W., Sanders, L., Rockey, D. C.
(2006). Causes of Errors in Polyp Detection at Air-Contrast Barium Enema Examination. Radiology
239: 139-148
[Abstract][Full Text]
Taylor, W. C.
(2006). A 71-Year-Old Woman Contemplating a Screening Colonoscopy. JAMA
295: 1161-1167
[Full Text]
Macari, M., Bini, E. J.
(2005). CT Colonography: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?. Radiology
237: 819-833
[Abstract][Full Text]
Eisen, G. M., Weinberg, D. S.
(2005). Narrative Review: Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with a First-Degree Relative with Colonic Neoplasia. ANN INTERN MED
143: 190-198
[Abstract][Full Text]
van Kouwen, M. C.A., Nagengast, F. M., Jansen, J. B.M.J., Oyen, W. J.G., Drenth, J. P.H.
(2005). 2-(18F)-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography Detects Clinical Relevant Adenomas of the Colon: A Prospective Study. JCO
23: 3713-3717
[Abstract][Full Text]
Nadel, M. R., Shapiro, J. A., Klabunde, C. N., Seeff, L. C., Uhler, R., Smith, R. A., Ransohoff, D. F.
(2005). A National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Methods for Screening for Fecal Occult Blood. ANN INTERN MED
142: 86-94
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hawk, E. T., Levin, B.
(2005). Colorectal Cancer Prevention. JCO
23: 378-391
[Abstract][Full Text]
Boyle, P., Vainio, H., Smith, R., Benamouzig, R., Lee, W. C., Segnan, N., Takima, K., Tsubono, Y.
(2005). Workgroup I: criteria for screening. UICC International Workshop on Facilitating Screening for Colorectal Cancer, Oslo, Norway (29 and 30 June 2002). Ann Oncol
16: 25-30
[Full Text]
Battat, A. C., Rouse, R. V., Dempsey, L., Safadi, B. Y., Wren, S. M.
(2004). Institutional Commitment to Rectal Cancer Screening Results in Earlier-Stage Cancers on Diagnosis. Ann. Surg. Oncol.
11: 970-976
[Abstract][Full Text]
van Gelder, R. E., Birnie, E., Florie, J., Schutter, M. P., Bartelsman, J. F., Snel, P., Lameris, J. S., Bonsel, G. J., Stoker, J.
(2004). CT Colonography and Colonoscopy: Assessment of Patient Preference in a 5-week Follow-up Study. Radiology
0: 2331031208-
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pickhardt, P. J., Nugent, P. A., Mysliwiec, P. A., Choi, J. R., Schindler, W. R.
(2004). Location of Adenomas Missed by Optical Colonoscopy. ANN INTERN MED
141: 352-359
[Abstract][Full Text]
Macari, M., Bini, E. J., Jacobs, S. L., Naik, S., Lui, Y. W., Milano, A., Rajapaksa, R., Megibow, A. J., Babb, J.
(2004). Colorectal Polyps and Cancers in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Patients: Evaluation with CT Colonography. Radiology
230: 629-636
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sosna, J., Morrin, M. M., Kruskal, J. B., Lavin, P. T., Rosen, M. P., Raptopoulos, V.
(2003). CT Colonography of Colorectal Polyps: A Metaanalysis. Am. J. Roentgenol.
181: 1593-1598
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ferrucci, J. T.
(2003). Virtual Colonoscopy for Colon Cancer Screening: Further Reflections on Polyps and Politics. Am. J. Roentgenol.
181: 795-797
[Full Text]
Colucci, P. M., Yale, S. H., Rall, C. J.
(2003). Colorectal Polyps. Clin Med Res
1: 261-262
[Full Text]
Thomas, P D, Forbes, A, Green, J, Howdle, P, Long, R, Playford, R, Sheridan, M, Stevens, R, Valori, R, Walters, J, Addison, G M, Hill, P, Brydon, G
(2003). Guidelines for the investigation of chronic diarrhoea, 2nd edition. Gut
52: v1-15
[Full Text]
Walsh, J. M. E., Terdiman, J. P.
(2003). Colorectal Cancer Screening: Scientific Review. JAMA
289: 1288-1296
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ko, C. W., Kreuter, W., Baldwin, L.-M.
(2002). Effect of Medicare Coverage on Use of Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests. Arch Intern Med
162: 2581-2586
[Abstract][Full Text]
Klabunde, C. N., Jones, E., Brown, M. L., Davis, W. W.
(2002). Colorectal Cancer Screening with Double-Contrast Barium Enema: A National Survey of Diagnostic Radiologists. Am. J. Roentgenol.
179: 1419-1427
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yee, J.
(2002). CT Screening for Colorectal Cancer. RadioGraphics
22: 1525-1531
[Full Text]
Swaroop, V. S., Larson, M. V.
(2002). Colonoscopy as a Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer in Average-Risk Individuals. Mayo Clin Proc.
77: 951-956
[Abstract]
Pignone, M., Saha, S., Hoerger, T., Mandelblatt, J.
(2002). Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. ANN INTERN MED
137: 96-104
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pignone, M., Rich, M., Teutsch, S. M., Berg, A. O., Lohr, K. N.
(2002). Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults at Average Risk: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. ANN INTERN MED
137: 132-141
[Abstract][Full Text]
Iyer, R. B., Silverman, P. M., DuBrow, R. A., Charnsangavej, C.
(2002). Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Follow-Up of Colorectal Cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol.
179: 3-13
[Full Text]
Ransohoff, D. F., Traverso, G., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B.
(2002). Fecal DNA Tests for Colorectal Cancer. NEJM
346: 1912-1913
[Full Text]
Lynch, P. M.
(2002). Screening Colonoscopy for Family History of Colorectal Cancer: A Growing Consensus. Ann. Surg. Oncol.
9: 425-427
[Full Text]
Gollub, M. J., Ginsberg, M. S., Cooper, C., Thaler, H. T.
(2002). Quality of Virtual Colonoscopy in Patients Who Have Undergone Radiation Therapy or Surgery: How Successful Are We?. Am. J. Roentgenol.
178: 1109-1116
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lewis, J. D., Brown, A., Localio, A. R., Schwartz, J. S.
(2002). Initial Evaluation of Rectal Bleeding in Young Persons: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. ANN INTERN MED
136: 99-110
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ransohoff, D. F., Sandler, R. S.
(2002). Screening for Colorectal Cancer. NEJM
346: 40-44
[Full Text]
Ferrucci, J. T.
(2001). Colon Cancer Screening with Virtual Colonoscopy: Promise, Polyps, Politics. Am. J. Roentgenol.
177: 975-988
[Full Text]
Seppala, R. E.
(2001). The Double-Contrast Barium Enema Examination. Radiology
221: 273-274
[Full Text]
Winawer, S. J.
(2001). A Quarter Century of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Progress and Prospects. JCO
19: 6s-12
[Full Text]
Yasuda, S., Fujii, H., Nakahara, T., Nishiumi, N., Takahashi, W., Ide, M., Shohtsu, A.
(2001). 18F-FDG PET Detection of Colonic Adenomas. JNM
42: 989-992
[Abstract][Full Text]
WINAWER, S J, ZAUBER, A G
(2001). Colonoscopic polypectomy and the incidence of colorectal cancer. Gut
48: 753-754
[Full Text]
Yee, J., Akerkar, G. A., Hung, R. K., Steinauer-Gebauer, A. M., Wall, S. D., McQuaid, K. R.
(2001). Colorectal Neoplasia: Performance Characteristics of CT Colonography for Detection in 300 Patients. Radiology
219: 685-692
[Abstract][Full Text]
Budenholzer, B., Welch, H. G., Donohoe, M., Glick, S. N., Frazier, A. L., Kuntz, K. M.
(2001). Cost-effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening. JAMA
285: 407-408
[Full Text]
Smith, R. A., von Eschenbach, A. C., Wender, R., Levin, B., Byers, T., Rothenberger, D., Brooks, D., Creasman, W., Cohen, C., Runowicz, C., Saslow, D., Cokkinides, V., Eyre, H.
(2001). American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer: Update of Early Detection Guidelines for Prostate, Colorectal, and Endometrial Cancers: ALSO: Update 2001--Testing for Early Lung Cancer Detection. CA Cancer J Clin
51: 38-75
[Abstract][Full Text]
Glick, S. N., Fibus, T., Fister, M. R., Balfe, D. M., Anderson, J. C., Birk, J. W., Shaw, R. D., Zauber, A. G., Winawer, S. J., Stewart, E. T.
(2000). Comparison of Colonoscopy and Double-Contrast Barium Enema. NEJM
343: 1728-1730
[Full Text]
Woolf, S. H.
(2000). The Best Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer -- A Personal Choice. NEJM
343: 1641-1643
[Full Text]
Frazier, A. L., Colditz, G. A., Fuchs, C. S., Kuntz, K. M.
(2000). Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Colorectal Cancer in the General Population. JAMA
284: 1954-1961
[Abstract][Full Text]
(2000). Double-Contrast Barium Enema Detects Only Half of Large Adenomas. JWatch Gastroenterology
2000: 1-1
[Full Text]
Podolsky, D. K.
(2000). Going the Distance -- The Case for True Colorectal-Cancer Screening. NEJM
343: 207-208
[Full Text]
(2000). Barium Enema vs. Colonoscopy for Polyp Surveillance. JWatch General
2000: 1-1
[Full Text]
Fletcher, R. H.
(2000). The End of Barium Enemas?. NEJM
342: 1823-1824
[Full Text]
Svensson, M. H., Svensson, E., Lasson, A., Hellstrom, M.
(2002). Patient Acceptance of CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy: Prospective Comparative Study in Patients with or Suspected of Having Colorectal Disease. Radiology
222: 337-345
[Abstract][Full Text]
Levine, M. S., Glick, S. N., Rubesin, S. E., Laufer, I.
(2002). Double-Contrast Barium Enema Examination and Colorectal Cancer: A Plea For Radiologic Screening. Radiology
222: 313-315
[Full Text]