The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 343:1282-1289 November 2, 2000 Number 18
NextNext

Inhaled Zanamivir for the Prevention of Influenza in Families
Frederick G. Hayden, M.D., Larisa V. Gubareva, Ph.D., Arnold S. Monto, M.D., Thomas C. Klein, M.D., Michael J. Elliott, M.D., Janet M. Hammond, M.D., Ph.D., Stephen J. Sharp, M.A., Michael J. Ossi, M.D., for The Zanamivir Family Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Wright, P.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background As prophylaxis against influenza in families, amantadine and rimantadine have had inconsistent effectiveness, partly because of the transmission of drug-resistant variants from treated index patients. We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of inhaled zanamivir for the treatment and prevention of influenza in families.

Methods We enrolled families (with two to five members and at least one child who was five years of age or older) before the 1998–1999 influenza season. If an influenza-like illness developed in one member, the family was randomly assigned to receive either inhaled zanamivir or placebo. The family member with the index illness was treated with either 10 mg of inhaled zanamivir (163 subjects) or placebo (158) twice a day for 5 days, and the other family members received either 10 mg of zanamivir (414 subjects) or placebo (423) once a day as prophylaxis for 10 days. The primary end point was the proportion of families in which at least one household contact had symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza.

Results The proportion of families with at least one initially healthy household contact in whom influenza developed was smaller in the zanamivir group than in the placebo group (4 percent vs. 19 percent, P<0.001); the difference represented a 79 percent reduction in the proportion of families with at least one affected contact. Zanamivir provided protection against both influenza A and influenza B. A neuraminidase-inhibition assay and sequencing of the neuraminidase and hemagglutinin genes revealed no zanamivir-resistant variants. Among the subjects with index cases of laboratory-confirmed influenza, the median duration of symptoms was 2.5 days shorter in the zanamivir group than in the placebo group (5.0 vs. 7.5 days, P=0.01). Zanamivir was well tolerated.

Conclusions When combined with the treatment of index cases, prophylactic treatment of family members with once-daily inhaled zanamivir is well tolerated and prevents the development of influenza. In this study there was no evidence of the emergence of resistant influenza variants.


Source Information

From the University of Virginia, Charlottesville (F.G.H., L.V.G.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.S.M.); Heartland Research, Wichita, Kans. (T.C.K.); Glaxo Wellcome, Research Triangle Park, N.C. (M.J.E., J.M.H., M.J.O.); and Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Greenford, United Kingdom (S.J.S.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Hayden at the University of Virginia, Health Sciences Center, Box 800473, Charlottesville, VA 22908.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.