The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 343:1750-1757 December 14, 2000 Number 24
NextNext

Fludarabine Compared with Chlorambucil as Primary Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Kanti R. Rai, M.B., B.S., Bercedis L. Peterson, Ph.D., Frederick R. Appelbaum, M.D., Jonathan Kolitz, M.D., Laurence Elias, M.D., Lois Shepherd, M.D., John Hines, M.D., Gregory A. Threatte, M.D., Richard A. Larson, M.D., Bruce D. Cheson, M.D., and Charles A. Schiffer, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Dighiero, G.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Fludarabine is an effective treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia that does not respond to initial treatment with chlorambucil. We compared the efficacy of fludarabine with that of chlorambucil in the primary treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Methods Between 1990 and 1994, we randomly assigned 509 previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia to one of the following treatments: fludarabine (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area, administered intravenously daily for 5 days every 28 days), chlorambucil (40 mg per square meter, given orally every 28 days), or fludarabine (20 mg per square meter per day for 5 days every 28 days) plus chlorambucil (20 mg per square meter every 28 days). Patients with an additional response at each monthly evaluation continued to receive the assigned treatment for a maximum of 12 cycles.

Results Assignment of patients to the fludarabine-plus-chlorambucil group was stopped when a planned interim analysis revealed excessive toxicity and a response rate that was not better than the rate with fludarabine alone. Among the other two groups, the response rate was significantly higher for fludarabine alone than for chlorambucil alone. Among 170 patients treated with fludarabine, 20 percent had a complete remission, and 43 percent had a partial remission. The corresponding values for 181 patients treated with chlorambucil were 4 percent and 33 percent (P< 0.001 for both comparisons). The median duration of remission and the median progression-free survival in the fludarabine group were 25 months and 20 months, respectively, whereas both values were 14 months in the chlorambucil group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The median overall survival among patients treated with fludarabine was 66 months, which was not significantly different from the overall survival in the other two groups (56 months with chlorambucil and 55 months with combined treatment). Severe infections and neutropenia were more frequent with fludarabine than with chlorambucil (P=0.08), although, overall, toxic effects were tolerable with the two single-drug regimens.

Conclusions When used as the initial treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, fludarabine yields higher response rates and a longer duration of remission and progression-free survival than chlorambucil; overall survival is not enhanced.


Source Information

From the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Chicago (K.R.R., B.L.P., J.K., G.A.T., R.A.L., C.A.S.); the Southwest Oncology Group, San Antonio, Tex. (F.R.A., L.E.); National Cancer Institute Canada, Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ont. (L.S.); the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Brookline, Mass. (J.H.); and the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Md. (B.D.C.). Presented in part at the plenary session of the 38th Annual Meet-ing of the American Society of Hematology, Orlando, Fla., December 6–10, 1996.The contents of this report are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Rai at the Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave., New Hyde Park, NY 11040, or at rai{at}lij.edu.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.