The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 344:243-249 January 25, 2001 Number 4
NextNext

Endoluminal Beta-Radiation Therapy for the Prevention of Coronary Restenosis after Balloon Angioplasty
Vitali Verin, M.D., Youri Popowski, M.D., Bernard de Bruyne, M.D., Dietrich Baumgart, M.D., Wolfgang Sauerwein, M.D., Markus Lins, M.D., Gyorgy Kovacs, M.D., Martyn Thomas, M.D., Francis Calman, M.D., Clemens Disco, M.Sc., Patrick W. Serruys, M.D., William Wijns, M.D., Marleen Piessens, Ph.D., John Kurtz, M.D., Ruediger Simon, M.D., Patrice Delafontaine, M.D., Raimund Erbel, M.D., for The Dose-Finding Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Beta radiation is effective in reducing vascular neointimal proliferation in animals after injury caused by balloon angioplasty. However, the lowest dose that can prevent restenosis after coronary angioplasty has yet to be determined.

Methods After successful balloon angioplasty of a previously untreated coronary stenosis, 181 patients were randomly assigned to receive 9, 12, 15, or 18 Gy of radiation delivered by a centered yttrium-90 source. Adjunctive stenting was required in 28 percent of the patients. The primary end point was the minimal luminal diameter six months after treatment, as a function of the delivered dose of radiation.

Results At the time of follow-up coronary angiography, the mean minimal luminal diameter was 1.67 mm in the 9-Gy group, 1.76 mm in the 12-Gy group, 1.83 mm in the 15-Gy group, and 1.97 mm in the 18-Gy group (P=0.06 for the comparison of 9 Gy with 18 Gy), resulting in restenosis rates of 29 percent, 21 percent, 16 percent, and 15 percent, respectively (P=0.14 for the comparison of 9 Gy with 18 Gy). At that time, 86 percent of the patients had had no serious cardiac events. In 130 patients treated with balloon angioplasty without a stent, restenosis rates were 28 percent, 17 percent, 16 percent, and 4 percent, respectively (P= 0.02 for the comparison of 9 Gy with 18 Gy). Among these patients, there was a dose-dependent enlargement of the lumen in 28 percent, 50 percent, 45 percent, and 74 percent of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for the comparison of 9 Gy with 18 Gy). The rate of repeated revascularization was 18 percent with 9 Gy and 6 percent with 18 Gy (P=0.26).

Conclusions Intracoronary beta-radiation therapy produces a significant dose-dependent decrease in the rate of restenosis after angioplasty. An 18-Gy dose not only prevents the renarrowing of the lumen typically observed after successful balloon angioplasty, but actually induces luminal enlargement.


Source Information

From the University Hospital, Geneva (V.V., Y.P.); the Cardiovascular Center, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium (B.B., W.W.); the University Hospital, Essen, Germany (D.B., W.S.); the University Hospital, Kiel, Germany (M.L., G.K.); King's College Hospital, London (M.T., F.C.); and Cardialysis and Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (C.D., P.W.S.). Other authors were Marleen Piessens, Ph.D., Cardiovascular Center, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; John Kurtz, M.D., University Hospital, Geneva; Ruediger Simon, M.D., University Hospital, Kiel, Germany; Patrice Delafontaine, M.D., University Hospital, Geneva; and Raimund Erbel, M.D., University Hospital, Essen, Germany.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Wijns at the Cardiovascular Center, OLV Hospital, B 9300 Aalst, Belgium, or at william.wijns{at}olvz-aalst.be.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.