The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 344:410-417 February 8, 2001 Number 6
NextNext

Use of Doppler Ultrasonography to Predict the Outcome of Therapy for Renal-Artery Stenosis
Jorg Radermacher, M.D., Ajay Chavan, M.D., Jorg Bleck, M.D., Annabel Vitzthum, Birte Stoess, Michael Jan Gebel, M.D., Michael Galanski, M.D., Karl Martin Koch, M.D., and Hermann Haller, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Prospectively identifying patients whose renal function or blood pressure will improve after the correction of renal-artery stenosis has not been possible. We evaluated whether a high level of resistance to flow in the segmental arteries of both kidneys (indicated by resistance-index values of at least 80) can be used prospectively to select appropriate patients for treatment.

Methods We evaluated 5950 patients with hypertension for renal-artery stenosis using color Doppler ultrasonography, and we measured the resistance index as follows: [1 – (end-diastolic velocity ÷ maximal systolic velocity)] x 100. Among 138 patients who had unilateral or bilateral renal-artery stenosis of more than 50 percent of the luminal diameter and who underwent renal angioplasty or surgery, the procedure was technically successful in 131 (95 percent). Creatinine clearance and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure were measured before renal-artery stenosis was corrected; 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure; and yearly thereafter. The mean (±SD) duration of follow-up was 32±21 months.

Results Among the 35 patients (27 percent) who had resistance-index values of at least 80 before revascularization, the mean arterial pressure did not decrease by 10 mm Hg or more after revascularization in 34 (97 percent). Renal function declined (defined by a decrease in the creatinine clearance of at least 10 percent) in 28 (80 percent); 16 (46 percent) became dependent on dialysis; and 10 (29 percent) died during follow-up. Among the 96 patients (73 percent) with a resistance-index value of less than 80, the mean arterial pressure decreased by at least 10 percent in all but 6 patients (6 percent) after revascularization; renal function worsened in only 3 (3 percent), all of whom became dependent on dialysis; and 3 (3 percent) died (P<0.001 for the comparison with patients with a resistance-index value of at least 80).

Conclusions A renal resistance-index value of at least 80 reliably identifies patients with renal-artery stenosis in whom angioplasty or surgery will not improve renal function, blood pressure, or kidney survival.


Source Information

From the Departments of Nephrology (J.R., A.V., B.S., K.M.K., H.H.), Radiology (A.C., M.G.), and Gastroenterology (J.B., M.J.G.), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Radermacher at the Department of Nephrology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, P.O. Box 61 01 80, D-30625 Hannover, Germany, or at radermacher.joerg{at}mh-hannover.de.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.