The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 345:1660-1666 December 6, 2001 Number 23
NextNext

Fluconazole Prophylaxis against Fungal Colonization and Infection in Preterm Infants
David Kaufman, M.D., Robert Boyle, M.D., Kevin C. Hazen, Ph.D., James T. Patrie, M.S., Melinda Robinson, R.N., and Leigh Goodman Donowitz, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Invasive fungal infection is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. We evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic fluconazole in preventing fungal colonization and invasive infection in extremely-low-birth-weight infants.

Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial over a 30-month period in 100 preterm infants with birth weights of less than 1000 g. The infants were randomly assigned during the first five days of life to receive either intravenous fluconazole or placebo for six weeks. We obtained weekly surveillance cultures from all patients.

Results The 50 infants randomly assigned to fluconazole and the 50 control infants were similar in terms of birth weight, gestational age at birth, and base-line risk factors for fungal infection. During the six-week treatment period, fungal colonization was documented in 30 infants in the placebo group (60 percent) and 11 infants in the fluconazole group (22 percent; difference in risk, 0.38; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.56; P=0.002). Invasive fungal infection with positive growth of fungal isolates from the blood, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid developed in 10 infants in the placebo group (20 percent) and none of the infants in the fluconazole group (difference in risk, 0.20; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.36; P=0.008). The sensitivities of the fungal isolates to fluconazole did not change during the study, and no adverse effects of the fluconazole therapy were documented.

Conclusions Prophylactic administration of fluconazole during the first six weeks of life is effective in preventing fungal colonization and invasive fungal infection in infants with birth weights of less than 1000 g.


Source Information

From the Departments of Pediatrics (D.K., R.B., M.R., L.G.D.), Pathology and Microbiology (K.C.H.), and Health Evaluation Sciences (J.T.P.), University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Kaufman at the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Box 800386, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908, or at dak4r{at}virginia.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Fluconazole Prophylaxis against Fungal Infection in Preterm Infants
Dani C., Bertini G., Pezzati M., Casalaz D., Kaufman D., Boyle R., Grossman L. B. D.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1913-1914, Jun 13, 2002. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.