The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 346:975-980 March 28, 2002 Number 13
NextNext

Duration of Prophylaxis against Venous Thromboembolism with Enoxaparin after Surgery for Cancer
David Bergqvist, M.D., Ph.D., Giancarlo Agnelli, M.D., Alexander T. Cohen, M.D., Amiram Eldor, M.D., Paul E. Nilsson, M.D., Ph.D., Anne Le Moigne-Amrani, M.S., Flavia Dietrich-Neto, M.D., for the ENOXACAN II Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Abdominal surgery for cancer carries a high risk of venous thromboembolism, but the optimal duration of postoperative thromboprophylaxis is unknown.

Methods We conducted a double-blind, multicenter trial in which patients undergoing planned curative open surgery for abdominal or pelvic cancer received enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously) daily for 6 to 10 days and were then randomly assigned to receive either enoxaparin or placebo for another 21 days. Bilateral venography was performed between days 25 and 31, or sooner if symptoms of venous thromboembolism occurred. The primary end point with respect to efficacy was the incidence of venous thromboembolism between days 25 and 31. The primary safety end point was bleeding during the three-week period after randomization. The patients were followed for three months.

Results The intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy included 332 patients. The rates of venous thromboembolism at the end of the double-blind phase were 12.0 percent in the placebo group and 4.8 percent in the enoxaparin group (P=0.02). This difference persisted at three months (13.8 percent vs. 5.5 percent, P=0.01). Three patients in the enoxaparin group and six in the placebo group died within three months after surgery. There were no significant differences in the rates of bleeding or other complications during the double-blind or follow-up periods.

Conclusions Enoxaparin prophylaxis for four weeks after surgery for abdominal or pelvic cancer is safe and significantly reduces the incidence of venographically demonstrated thrombosis, as compared with enoxaparin prophylaxis for one week.


Source Information

From Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden (D.B.); Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy (G.A.); Guy's, King's and St. Thomas' School of Medicine, London (A.T.C.); Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel (A.E.); Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden (P.E.N.); and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, N.J. (A.L.M.-A., F.D.-N.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Bergqvist at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden, or at david.bergqvist{at}kirurgi.uu.se.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Prophylaxis against Venous Thromboembolism after Surgery for Cancer
Moulias S., Bouchon J.-P., Meaume S., Bergqvist D., the ENOXACAN II Study Group
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2002; 347:220, Jul 18, 2002. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.