FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 346:1288-1293 April 25, 2002 Number 17 Next

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background It is uncertain how assessments of medical care differ between enrollees in for-profit and nonprofit health maintenance organizations (HMOs).

Methods We analyzed the relation between the profit status of HMOs and enrollees' assessments of their care. We used data from two national surveys from the Community Tracking Study: the Household Survey, 1996–1997, and the 1997–1998 Insurance Followback Survey. The final sample included 13,271 persons under 65 years of age (10,654 adults and 2617 children) with employer-sponsored insurance who obtained health care through an HMO. A total of 12,445 enrollees who reported their health status as excellent, very good, or good were considered to be healthy; 826 with self-reported fair or poor health were considered to be sick.

Results In the sample as a whole, enrollees in nonprofit plans were more likely to be very satisfied with their overall care than enrollees in for-profit plans (adjusted means, 64.0 percent and 58.1 percent, respectively; P=0.01). Among enrollees in for-profit HMOs, sick enrollees were more likely than healthy enrollees to report unmet need or delayed care (17.4 percent vs. 13.1 percent, P=0.004) and organizational or administrative barriers to care (12.9 percent vs. 9.0 percent, P<0.001); they also reported higher out-of-pocket spending during the previous year ($731 vs. $480, P=0.002). For nonprofit HMOs, there was only one significant difference between the ratings of healthy and sick enrollees; sick enrollees expressed more trust in doctors to refer when needed.

Conclusions Although there are few overall differences in assessments of medical care between enrollees in for-profit and nonprofit HMOs, for-profit HMOs are rated less favorably than nonprofit HMOs by patients who have self-reported fair or poor health.

Source Information

From the Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, D.C.

Address reprint requests to Ms. Tu at the Center for Studying Health System Change, 600 Maryland Ave., SW, Ste. 550, Washington, DC 20024, or at htu{at}hschange.org.

Full Text of this Article

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lee, D. S., Tu, J. V., Chong, A., Alter, D. A. (2008). Patient Satisfaction and Its Relationship With Quality and Outcomes of Care After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 118: 1938-1945 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schlesinger, M., Gray, B. H. (2006). How Nonprofits Matter In American Medicine, And What To Do About It. Health Aff (Millwood) 25: W287-W303 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Colombo, J. D. (2006). The Role of Tax Exemption in a Competitive Health Care Market. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 31: 623-642 [Abstract]  
• Kim, C., Williamson, D. F., Mangione, C. M., Safford, M. M., Selby, J. V., Marrero, D. G., Curb, J. D., Thompson, T. J., Venkat Narayan, K.M., Herman, W. H. (2004). Managed Care Organization and the Quality of Diabetes Care: The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care 27: 1529-1534 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tai-Seale, M. (2004). Voting with Their Feet: Patient Exit and Intergroup Differences in Propensity for Switching Usual Source of Care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 29: 491-514 [Abstract]  
• Schneider, E. C., Zaslavsky, A. M., Epstein, A. M. (2004). Use of High-Cost Operative Procedures by Medicare Beneficiaries Enrolled in For-Profit and Not-for-Profit Health Plans. NEJM 350: 143-150 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Murkofsky, R. L., Phillips, R. S., McCarthy, E. P., Davis, R. B., Hamel, M. B. (2003). Length of Stay in Home Care Before and After the 1997 Balanced Budget Act. JAMA 289: 2841-2848 [Abstract] [Full Text]