The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 2003;348(6):560.

Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 346:1800-1806 June 6, 2002 Number 23
NextNext

Cost Effectiveness of Aspirin, Clopidogrel, or Both for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease
Jean-Michel Gaspoz, M.D., Pamela G. Coxson, Ph.D., Paula A. Goldman, M.P.H., Lawrence W. Williams, M.Sc., Karen M. Kuntz, Sc.D., M.G. Myriam Hunink, M.D., Ph.D., and Lee Goldman, M.D., M.P.H.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Wood, A. J.J.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Akinlade, B. K.
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Both aspirin and clopidogrel reduce the rate of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease. We estimated the cost effectiveness of the increased use of aspirin, clopidogrel, or both for secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease.

Methods We used the Coronary Heart Disease Policy Model, a computer simulation of the U.S. population, to estimate the incremental cost effectiveness (in dollars per quality-adjusted years of life gained) of four strategies in patients over 35 years of age with coronary disease from 2003 to 2027: aspirin for all eligible patients (i.e., those who were not allergic to or intolerant of aspirin), aspirin for all eligible patients plus clopidogrel for patients who were ineligible for aspirin, clopidogrel for all patients, and the combination of aspirin for all eligible patients plus clopidogrel for all patients.

Results The extension of aspirin therapy from the current levels of use to all eligible patients for 25 years would have an estimated cost-effectiveness ratio of about $11,000 per quality-adjusted year of life gained. The addition of clopidogrel for the 5 percent of patients who are ineligible for aspirin would cost about $31,000 per quality-adjusted year of life gained. Clopidogrel alone in all patients or in routine combination with aspirin had an incremental cost of more than $130,000 per quality-adjusted year of life gained and remained financially unattractive across a wide range of assumptions. However, clopidogrel alone or in combination with aspirin would cost less than $50,000 per quality-adjusted year of life gained if its price were reduced by 70 to 82 percent, to $1.00 and $0.60 per day, respectively.

Conclusions Increased prescription of aspirin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease is attractive from a cost-effectiveness perspective. Because clopidogrel is more costly, its incremental cost effectiveness is currently unattractive, unless its use is restricted to patients who are ineligible for aspirin.


Source Information

From the Clinique de Médecine II and the Division of Cardiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires, Geneva (J.-M.G.); the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco (P.G.C., L.G.); the Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston (P.A.G., L.W.W., K.M.K., M.G.M.H.); and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical School, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (M.G.M.H.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Gaspoz at the Clinique de Médecine II, Department of Medicine, Hôpitaux Universitaires, 24 rue Micheli-du-Crest, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland, or at jean-michel.gaspoz{at}hcuge.ch.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Aspirin, Clopidogrel, or Both for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Disease
Akinlade B. K., de Lemos J. A., McGuire D. K., Armstrong E. C., Ramsey S. D., Yaes R. J., Gaspoz J.-M., Coxson P., Goldman L., Wood A. J.J.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2003; 348:560-563, Feb 6, 2003. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.