The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:19-25 July 4, 2002 Number 1
NextNext

Absence of Association of Thrombophilia Polymorphisms with Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Claire Infante-Rivard, M.D., Ph.D., Georges-Etienne Rivard, M.D., Wagner V. Yotov, M.D., Ph.D., Emmanuelle Génin, Ph.D., Marguerite Guiguet, Ph.D., Clarice Weinberg, Ph.D., Robert Gauthier, M.D., and Juan Carlos Feoli-Fonseca, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Roberts, D.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Previous data have demonstrated associations between thrombophilia polymorphisms in pregnant women and an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction in their offspring, but this finding remains uncertain.

Methods We performed a hospital-based case–control study and a family-based study including 493 newborns with intrauterine growth restriction (defined by birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age and sex according to Canadian norms) and 472 controls (with birth weight at or above the 10th percentile). We determined the presence or absence in newborns and their parents of the following polymorphisms: methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C, factor V Leiden G1691A, and prothrombin G20210A. Mothers were interviewed to obtain information on other risk factors for intrauterine growth restriction.

Results The risk of intrauterine growth restriction was not increased among mothers carrying a polymorphism associated with thrombophilia. In the case–control study, the odds ratios associated with two copies of the variant, after adjustment for newborn genotype and other risk factors, were 1.55 for MTHFR C677T (95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 2.90) and 0.49 for MTHFR A1298C (95 percent confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.93); heterozygotes for factor V Leiden had an odds ratio of 1.18 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.54 to 2.55), and heterozygotes for prothrombin G20210A had an odds ratio of 0.92 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.36 to 2.35). These polymorphisms in the newborn were not associated with an increased risk. Newborns who were homozygous for the MTHFR C677T variant had a decreased risk of intrauterine growth restriction (odds ratio after adjustment for mother's genotype and other confounders, 0.52 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.94]). The results of the family-based study supported those of the case–control study.

Conclusions Our findings do not indicate that there are associations between maternal or newborn polymorphisms associated with thrombophilia and an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction.


Source Information

From the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal (C.I.-R.); the Research Centre (C.I.-R., G.-E.R., W.V.Y., J.C.F.-F.), the Division of Hematology and Oncology (G.E.-R., W.V.Y.), and the Department of Obstetrics (R.G.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Mère–Enfant, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montreal; INSERM Unité 535, Génétique Epidémiologique et Structure des Populations Humaines, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris (E.G., M.G.); and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, N.C. (C.W.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Infante-Rivard at the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 1130 Pine Ave. W., Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada, or at claire.infante-rivard{at}mcgill.ca.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Thrombophilia Polymorphisms and Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Kupferminc M. J., Many A., Lessing J. B., Grandone E., Margaglione M., Infante-Rivard C., Rivard G.-E., Gauthier R.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1530-1531, Nov 7, 2002. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.