The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 2003;348(8):758.

Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:1420-1425 October 31, 2002 Number 18
NextNext

Controlling Tuberculosis in India
G.R. Khatri, M.D., D.P.H., and Thomas R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Drazen, J. M.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Udwadia, Z. F.
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Tuberculosis kills nearly 500,000 people in India each year. Until recently, less than half of patients with tuberculosis received an accurate diagnosis, and less than half of those received effective treatment.

Methods We analyzed the effects of new policies introduced in 1993 that have resulted in increased resources, improved laboratory-based diagnosis, direct observation of treatment, and the use of standardized antituberculosis regimens and reporting methods.

Results By September 2001, more than 200,000 health workers had been trained, and 436 million people (more than 40 percent of the entire population) had access to services. About 3.4 million patients had been evaluated for tuberculosis, and nearly 800,000 had received treatment, with a success rate greater than 80 percent. More than half of all those treated in the past 8 years were treated in the past 12 months.

Conclusions India's tuberculosis-control program has been successful in improving access to care, the quality of diagnosis, and the likelihood of successful treatment. We estimate that the improved program has prevented 200,000 deaths, with indirect savings of more than $400 million — more than eight times the cost of implementation. It will be a substantial challenge to sustain and expand the program, given the country's level of economic development, limited primary health care system, and large and mostly unregulated private health care system, as well as the dual threats of the human immunodeficiency virus and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.


Source Information

From the Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi (G.R.K.); the Regional Office for South-East Asia, World Health Organization, New Delhi, India (T.R.F.); and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (T.R.F.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Frieden at 125 Worth St., CN 28, New York, NY 10013, or at tfrieden{at}health.nyc.gov.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.