The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 348:2500-2507 June 19, 2003 Number 25
NextNext

Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Integrated Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography
Didier Lardinois, M.D., Walter Weder, M.D., Thomas F. Hany, M.D., Ehab M. Kamel, M.D., Stephan Korom, M.D., Burkhardt Seifert, Ph.D., Gustav K. von Schulthess, M.D., Ph.D., and Hans C. Steinert, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Koh, D.-M.
-Letters
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background We compared the diagnostic accuracy of integrated positron-emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) with that of CT alone, that of PET alone, and that of conventional visual correlation of PET and CT in determining the stage of disease in non–small-cell lung cancer.

Methods In a prospective study, integrated PET–CT was performed in 50 patients with proven or suspected non–small-cell lung cancer. CT and PET alone, visually correlated PET and CT, and integrated PET–CT were evaluated separately, and a tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) stage was assigned on the basis of image analysis. Nodal stations were identified according to the mapping system of the American Thoracic Society. The standard of reference was histopathological assessment of tumor stage and node stage. Extrathoracic metastases were confirmed histopathologically or by at least one other imaging method. A paired sign test was used to compare integrated PET–CT with the other imaging methods.

Results Integrated PET–CT provided additional information in 20 of 49 patients (41 percent), beyond that provided by conventional visual correlation of PET and CT. Integrated PET–CT had better diagnostic accuracy than the other imaging methods. Tumor staging was significantly more accurate with integrated PET–CT than with CT alone (P=0.001), PET alone (P<0.001), or visual correlation of PET and CT (P=0.013); node staging was also significantly more accurate with integrated PET–CT than with PET alone (P=0.013). In metastasis staging, integrated PET–CT increased the diagnostic certainty in two of eight patients.

Conclusions Integrated PET–CT improves the diagnostic accuracy of the staging of non–small-cell lung cancer.


Source Information

From the Divisions of Thoracic Surgery (D.L., W.W., S.K.) and Nuclear Medicine (T.F.H., E.M.K., G.K.S., H.C.S.), University Hospital of Zurich; and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich (B.S.) — both in Zurich, Switzerland.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Steinert at the Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland, or at hans.steinert{at}dmr.usz.ch.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Integrated PET and CT
Schirrmeister H., Hetzel M., Buck A., Pravinkumar E., Miles K. A., Comans E. F., Lardinois D., Weder W., Steinert H. C.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2003; 349:1188-1190, Sep 18, 2003. Correspondence

Staging of Lung Cancer with Integrated PET–CT
Ollenberger G. P., Weder W., von Schulthess G. K., Steinert H. C.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2004; 350:86-87, Jan 1, 2004. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.