The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 348:583-592 February 13, 2003 Number 7
NextNext

A Comparison of Outcomes with Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibitors and Diuretics for Hypertension in the Elderly
Lindon M.H. Wing, M.B., B.S., Christopher M. Reid, Ph.D., Philip Ryan, M.B., B.S., Lawrence J. Beilin, M.D., Mark A. Brown, M.B., B.S., M.D., Garry L.R. Jennings, M.D., Colin I. Johnston, M.B., B.S., John J. McNeil, M.B., B.S., Graham J. Macdonald, M.D., John E. Marley, M.D., M.B., Ch.B., Trefor O. Morgan, M.B., B.S., Malcolm J. West, M.B., B.S., for the Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Supplementary Material

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Frohlich, E. D.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Treatment of hypertension with diuretics, beta-blockers, or both leads to improved outcomes. It has been postulated that agents that inhibit the renin–angiotensin system confer benefit beyond the reduction of blood pressure alone. We compared the outcomes in older subjects with hypertension who were treated with angiotensin-converting–enzyme (ACE) inhibitors with the outcomes in those treated with diuretic agents.

Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label study with blinded assessment of end points in 6083 subjects with hypertension who were 65 to 84 years of age and received health care at 1594 family practices. Subjects were followed for a median of 4.1 years, and the total numbers of cardiovascular events in the two treatment groups were compared with the use of multivariate proportional-hazards models.

Results At base line, the treatment groups were well matched in terms of age, sex, and blood pressure. By the end of the study, blood pressure had decreased to a similar extent in both groups (a decrease of 26/12 mm Hg). There were 695 cardiovascular events or deaths from any cause in the ACE-inhibitor group (56.1 per 1000 patient-years) and 736 cardiovascular events or deaths from any cause in the diuretic group (59.8 per 1000 patient-years; the hazard ratio for a cardiovascular event or death with ACE-inhibitor treatment was 0.89 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.00]; P=0.05). Among male subjects, the hazard ratio was 0.83 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 0.97; P=0.02); among female subjects, the hazard ratio was 1.00 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.21; P=0.98); the P value for the interaction between sex and treatment-group assignment was 0.15. The rates of nonfatal cardiovascular events and myocardial infarctions decreased with ACE-inhibitor treatment, whereas a similar number of strokes occurred in each group (although there were more fatal strokes in the ACE-inhibitor group).

Conclusions Initiation of antihypertensive treatment involving ACE inhibitors in older subjects, particularly men, appears to lead to better outcomes than treatment with diuretic agents, despite similar reductions of blood pressure.


Source Information

From the School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide (L.M.H.W.); the Baker Heart Research Institute, Melbourne (C.M.R., G.L.R.J., C.I.J.); the Department of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide (P.R.); the Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth (L.J.B.); the Department of Nephrology, University of New South Wales, Sydney (M.A.B.); the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne (J.J.M.); Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sydney (G.J.M.); the Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle (J.E.M.); the Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne (T.O.M.); and the Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane (M.J.W.) — all in Australia.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Reid at the Baker Heart Research Institute, P.O. Box 6492, St. Kilda Rd. Central, Melbourne, VIC 8008, Australia, or at chris.reid{at}baker.edu.au.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibitors and Diuretics for Hypertension
Pickering T. G., Krut L. H., Reese A. M., Talbert R. L., Bussey H. I., Esnault V. L.M., Davis B. R., Wright J. T. Jr., Cutler J. A., Wing L. M.H., Reid C. M., Jennings G. L.R., the ANBP2 Management Committee , Frohlich E. D.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2003; 349:90-93, Jul 3, 2003. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.