The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 2003;349(26):2577.

A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 2004;351(2):200.

Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 349:1133-1138 September 18, 2003 Number 12
NextNext

A Comparison of Two Intensities of Warfarin for the Prevention of Recurrent Thrombosis in Patients with the Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome
Mark A. Crowther, M.D., M.Sc., Jeff S. Ginsberg, M.D., Jim Julian, M.Math., Judah Denburg, M.D., Jack Hirsh, M.D., James Douketis, M.D., Carl Laskin, M.D., Paul Fortin, M.D., David Anderson, M.D., M.Sc., Clive Kearon, M.D., Ph.D., Ann Clarke, M.D., William Geerts, M.D., Melissa Forgie, M.D., David Green, M.D., Lorrie Costantini, M.Sc., Wendy Yacura, Sarah Wilson, M.P.H., Michael Gent, D.Sc., and Michael J. Kovacs, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Lockshin, M. D.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Many patients with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and recurrent thrombosis receive doses of warfarin adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of more than 3.0. However, there are no prospective data to support this approach to thromboprophylaxis.

Methods We performed a randomized, double-blind trial in which patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and previous thrombosis were assigned to receive enough warfarin to achieve an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 (moderate intensity) or 3.1 to 4.0 (high intensity). Our objective was to show that high-intensity warfarin was more effective in preventing thrombosis than moderate-intensity warfarin.

Results A total of 114 patients were enrolled in the study and followed for a mean of 2.7 years. Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 6 of 56 patients (10.7 percent) assigned to receive high-intensity warfarin and in 2 of 58 patients (3.4 percent) assigned to receive moderate-intensity warfarin (hazard ratio for the high-intensity group, 3.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 15.0). Major bleeding occurred in three patients assigned to receive high-intensity warfarin and four patients assigned to receive moderate-intensity warfarin (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 4.8).

Conclusions High-intensity warfarin was not superior to moderate-intensity warfarin for thromboprophylaxis in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and previous thrombosis. The low rate of recurrent thrombosis among patients in whom the target INR was 2.0 to 3.0 suggests that moderate-intensity warfarin is appropriate for patients with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.


Source Information

From the Departments of Medicine (M.A.C., J.S.G., J. Denburg, J.H., J. Douketis, C.K.) and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.J., L.C., W.Y., M.G.), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; the Department of Medicine (C.L., P.F., W.G.) and the Undergraduate Medical Program (S.W.), University of Toronto, Toronto; the Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (D.A.); the Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal (A.C.); the Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (M.F.); and the Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont. (M.J.K.) — all in Canada; and the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago (D.G.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Crowther at St. Joseph's Hospital, Rm. L208, 50 Charlton Ave. E., Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada, or at crowthrm{at}mcmaster.ca.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Warfarin Prophylaxis in the Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome
Paul N., Kosinski C. M., Gelber A. C., Saleh A. S., Stern S. D., Crowther M., Ginsberg J.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2568-2570, Dec 25, 2003. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.