The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 349:1501-1509 October 16, 2003 Number 16
NextNext

Risk of Cervical Cancer Associated with Extending the Interval between Cervical-Cancer Screenings
George F. Sawaya, M.D., K. John McConnell, Ph.D., Shalini L. Kulasingam, Ph.D., Herschel W. Lawson, M.D., Karla Kerlikowske, M.D., Joy Melnikow, M.D., M.P.H., Nancy C. Lee, M.D., Ginny Gildengorin, Ph.D., Evan R. Myers, M.D., M.P.H., and A. Eugene Washington, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Feldman, S.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Although contemporary guidelines suggest that the intervals between Papanicolaou tests can be extended to three years among low-risk women with previous negative tests, the excess risk of cervical cancer associated with less frequent than annual screening is uncertain.

Methods We determined the prevalence of biopsy-proven cervical neoplasia among 938,576 women younger than 65 years of age, stratified according to the number of previous consecutive negative Papanicolaou tests. Using a Markov model that estimates the rate at which dysplasia will progress to cancer, we estimated the risk of cancer within three years after one or more negative Papanicolaou tests, as well as the number of additional Papanicolaou tests and colposcopic examinations that would be required to avert one case of cancer given a particular interval between screenings.

Results Among 31,728 women 30 to 64 years of age who had had three or more consecutive negative tests, the prevalence of biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 was 0.028 percent and the prevalence of grade 3 neoplasia was 0.019 percent; none of the women had invasive cervical cancer. According to our model, the estimated risk of cancer with annual Papanicolaou tests for three years was 2 in 100,000 among women 30 to 44 years of age, 1 in 100,000 among women 45 to 59 years of age, and 1 in 100,000 among women 60 to 64 years of age; these risks would be 5 in 100,000, 2 in 100,000, and 1 in 100,000, respectively, if screening were performed once three years after the last negative test. To avert one additional case of cancer by screening 100,000 women annually for three years rather than once three years after the last negative test, an average of 69,665 additional Papanicolaou tests and 3861 colposcopic examinations would be needed in women 30 to 44 years of age and an average of 209,324 additional Papanicolaou tests and 11,502 colposcopic examinations in women 45 to 59 years of age.

Conclusions As compared with annual screening for three years, screening performed once three years after the last negative test in women 30 to 64 years of age who have had three or more consecutive negative Papanicolaou tests is associated with an average excess risk of cervical cancer of approximately 3 in 100,000.


Source Information

From the Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences (G.F.S., K.J.M., G.G., A.E.W.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.F.S., K.K., A.E.W.), and Medicine (K.K., G.G.), and the General Internal Medicine Section (K.K.), Department of Veterans Affairs and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco; the Department of Emergency Medicine, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (K.J.M.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, N.C. (S.L.K., E.R.M.); the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (H.W.L., N.C.L.); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento (J.M.).

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Extending the Interval between Cervical-Cancer Screenings
Rufleth P. W., Sawaya G. F., Kulasingam S., Lawson H.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2004; 350:414-415, Jan 22, 2004. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.