The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 2004;350(25):2628.

Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 349:2495-2502 December 25, 2003 Number 26
NextNext

Single versus Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma
Michel Attal, M.D., Jean-Luc Harousseau, M.D., Thierry Facon, M.D., François Guilhot, M.D., Chantal Doyen, M.D., Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet, M.D., Mathieu Monconduit, M.D., Cyrille Hulin, M.D., Denis Caillot, M.D., Reda Bouabdallah, M.D., Laurent Voillat, M.D., Jean-Jacques Sotto, M.D., Bernard Grosbois, M.D., Regis Bataille, M.D., for the InterGroupe Francophone du Myélome

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Stadtmauer, E. A.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background We conducted a randomized trial of the treatment of multiple myeloma with high-dose chemotherapy followed by either one or two successive autologous stem-cell transplantations.

Methods At the time of diagnosis, 399 previously untreated patients under the age of 60 years were randomly assigned to receive a single or double transplant.

Results A complete or a very good partial response was achieved by 42 percent of patients in the single-transplant group and 50 percent of patients in the double-transplant group (P=0.10). The probability of surviving event-free for seven years after the diagnosis was 10 percent in the single-transplant group and 20 percent in the double-transplant group (P=0.03). The estimated overall seven-year survival rate was 21 percent in the single-transplant group and 42 percent in the double-transplant group (P=0.01). Among patients who did not have a very good partial response within three months after one transplantation, the probability of surviving seven years was 11 percent in the single-transplant group and 43 percent in the double-transplant group (P<0.001). Four factors were significantly related to survival: base-line serum levels of beta2-microglobulin (P<0.01) and lactate dehydrogenase (P<0.01), age (P<0.05), and treatment group (P<0.01).

Conclusions As compared with a single autologous stem-cell transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy, double transplantation improves overall survival among patients with myeloma, especially those who do not have a very good partial response after undergoing one transplantation.


Source Information

From the Departments of Hematology and Biostatistics, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France (M.A.); Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France (J.-L.H., R. Bataille); Hôpital C. Huriez, Lille, France (T.F.); Centre Hospitalier la Mileterie, Poitiers, France (F.G.); Centre Universitaire Saint Luc, Brussells, Belgium (C.D.); Hôpital du Cimiez, Nice, France ( J.-G.F.); Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France (M.M.); Centre Hospitalier Brabois, Nancy, France (C.H.); Centre Hospitalier Le Bocage, Dijon, France (D.C.); Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseilles, France (R. Bouabdallah); Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France (L.V.); Hôpital Albert Michallon, Grenoble, France (J.-J.S.); and Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France (B.G.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Attal at the Service d'Hématologie, Hôpital Purpan, Place du Dr. Baylac, 31059 Toulouse, France, or at attal.m{at}chu-toulouse.fr.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Tandem Bone Marrow Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma
Murashige N., Kishi Y., Chng W. J., Musto P., Attal M.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1466-1467, Apr 1, 2004. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.