FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 350:2050-2059 May 13, 2004 Number 20 Next

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text PowerPoint Slide Set Editorial by Pappas, T. N. Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited E-mail When Letters Appear PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Minimally invasive, laparoscopically assisted surgery was first considered in 1990 for patients undergoing colectomy for cancer. Concern that this approach would compromise survival by failing to achieve a proper oncologic resection or adequate staging or by altering patterns of recurrence (based on frequent reports of tumor recurrences within surgical wounds) prompted a controlled trial evaluation.

Methods We conducted a noninferiority trial at 48 institutions and randomly assigned 872 patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon to undergo open or laparoscopically assisted colectomy performed by credentialed surgeons. The median follow-up was 4.4 years. The primary end point was the time to tumor recurrence.

Results At three years, the rates of recurrence were similar in the two groups — 16 percent among patients in the group that underwent laparoscopically assisted surgery and 18 percent among patients in the open-colectomy group (two-sided P=0.32; hazard ratio for recurrence, 0.86; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.63 to 1.17). Recurrence rates in surgical wounds were less than 1 percent in both groups (P=0.50). The overall survival rate at three years was also very similar in the two groups (86 percent in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 85 percent in the open-colectomy group; P=0.51; hazard ratio for death in the laparoscopic-surgery group, 0.91; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.21), with no significant difference between groups in the time to recurrence or overall survival for patients with any stage of cancer. Perioperative recovery was faster in the laparoscopic-surgery group than in the open-colectomy group, as reflected by a shorter median hospital stay (five days vs. six days, P<0.001) and briefer use of parenteral narcotics (three days vs. four days, P<0.001) and oral analgesics (one day vs. two days, P=0.02). The rates of intraoperative complications, 30-day postoperative mortality, complications at discharge and 60 days, hospital readmission, and reoperation were very similar between groups.

Conclusions In this multi-institutional study, the rates of recurrent cancer were similar after laparoscopically assisted colectomy and open colectomy, suggesting that the laparoscopic approach is an acceptable alternative to open surgery for colon cancer.

Source Information

The preparation of this article was overseen by the writing committee of the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group of the Laparoscopic Colectomy Trial (Heidi Nelson, M.D., Daniel J. Sargent, Ph.D., H. Sam Wieand, Ph.D., James Fleshman, M.D., Mehran Anvari, M.D., Steven J. Stryker, M.D., Robert W. Beart, Jr., M.D., Michael Hellinger, M.D., Richard Flanagan, Jr., M.D., Walter Peters, M.D., and David Ota, M.D.), who assume responsibility for the overall content and integrity of the article.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Heidi Nelson at the Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

Full Text of this Article

Related Letters:

Laparoscopically Assisted versus Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer
Tinmouth J., Tomlinson G., Dalibon N., Moutafis M., Fischler M., Nelson H., Sargent D. J.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2004; 351:933-934, Aug 26, 2004. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Inomata, M., Yasuda, K., Shiraishi, N., Kitano, S. (2009). Clinical Evidences of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39: 471-477 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Farjah, F., Wood, D. E., Mulligan, M. S., Krishnadasan, B., Heagerty, P. J., Symons, R. G., Flum, D. R. (2009). Safety and efficacy of video-assisted versus conventional lung resection for lung cancer.. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 137: 1415-1421 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Green, C. J., Maxwell, R., Verne, J., Martin, R. M., Blazeby, J. M. (2009). The influence of NICE guidance on the uptake of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. J Public Health (Oxf) 0: fdp027v1-fdp027 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bilimoria, K. Y., Ko, C. Y. (2009). Is Laparoscopic Colectomy a Good Operation for Colon Cancer?--Reply. Arch Surg 144: 291-291 [Full Text]  
• Fisher, B. (2008). Biological Research in the Evolution of Cancer Surgery: A Personal Perspective. Cancer Res. 68: 10007-10020 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kemp, J. A., Finlayson, S. R. G. (2008). Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Colectomy: A National Population-Based Comparison. SURG INNOV 15: 277-283 [Abstract]  
• Ross, H. M., Simmang, C. L., Fleshman, J. W., Marcello, P. W. (2008). Adoption of Laparoscopic Colectomy: Results and Implications of ASCRS Hands-On Course Participation. SURG INNOV 15: 179-183 [Abstract]  
• Blumberg, D. (2008). Is Operative Conversion Necessary for Patients Diagnosed With Dense Adhesions During an Elective Laparoscopic Colectomy?. SURG INNOV 15: 213-218 [Abstract]  
• Bilimoria, K. Y., Bentrem, D. J., Nelson, H., Stryker, S. J., Stewart, A. K., Soper, N. J., Russell, T. R., Ko, C. Y. (2008). Use and Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Cancer in the United States. Arch Surg 143: 832-840 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sa Cunha, A., Rault, A., Beau, C., Laurent, C., Collet, D., Masson, B. (2008). A Single-Institution Prospective Study of Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resection. Arch Surg 143: 289-295 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Boller, A.-M., Nelson, H. (2007). Colon and Rectal Cancer: Laparoscopic or Open?. Clin. Cancer Res. 13: 6894s-6896s [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Farjah, F., Flum, D. R. (2007). When Not Being Superior May Not Be Good Enough. JAMA 298: 924-925 [Full Text]  
• Wagman, L. D. (2007). Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Reaching Equipoise?. JCO 25: 2996-2998 [Full Text]  
• Jayne, D. G., Guillou, P. J., Thorpe, H., Quirke, P., Copeland, J., Smith, A. M.H., Heath, R. M., Brown, J. M. (2007). Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. JCO 25: 3061-3068 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Greene, F. L., Kercher, K. W., Nelson, H., Teigland, C. M., Boller, A.-M. (2007). Minimal Access Cancer Management. CA Cancer J Clin 57: 130-146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Weber, W. P., Guller, U., Jain, N. B., Pietrobon, R., Oertli, D. (2007). Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Caseload on the Likelihood of Performing Laparoscopic vs Open Sigmoid Resection for Diverticular Disease: A Study Based on 55 949 Patients. Arch Surg 142: 253-259 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Co, (2007). Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142: 298-303 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gill, S., Blackstock, A. W., Goldberg, R. M. (2007). Colorectal Cancer. Mayo Clin Proc. 82: 114-129 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McGory, M. L., Shekelle, P. G., Ko, C. Y. (2006). Development of Quality Indicators for Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery.. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 98: 1623-1633 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Haller, D. G., O'Connell, M. J., Sargent, D., Costantino, J. P., Wolmark, N. (2006). Sam Wieand, PhD. JCO 24: 4523-4525 [Full Text]  
• Goldberg, R. M., Niedzwiecki, D., Bertagnolli, M., Blackstock, A. W., Tepper, J. E., Mayer, R. J. (2006). Cancer and leukemia group B gastrointestinal cancer committee.. Clin. Cancer Res. 12: 3589s-3595s [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kohman, L. J. (2006). Cancer and leukemia group B surgery committee.. Clin. Cancer Res. 12: 3622s-3627s [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., Pocock, S. J., Evans, S. J. W., for the CONSORT Group, (2006). Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement. JAMA 295: 1152-1160 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zerey, M., Burns, J. M., Kercher, K. W., Kuwada, T. S., Heniford, B. T. (2006). Minimally Invasive Management of Colon Cancer. SURG INNOV 13: 5-15 [Abstract]  
• Stefanidis, D., Grove, K. D., Schwesinger, W. H., Thomas, C. R. Jr (2006). The current role of staging laparoscopy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a review. Ann Oncol 17: 189-199 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Piscatelli, N., Hyman, N., Osler, T. (2005). Localizing Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopy. Arch Surg 140: 932-935 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Roumm, A. R., Pizzi, L., Goldfarb, N. I., Cohn, H. (2005). Minimally Invasive: Minimally Reimbursed? An Examination of Six Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures. SURG INNOV 12: 261-287 [Abstract]  
• Silva, A. C., Hara, A. K., Leighton, J. A., Heppell, J. P. (2005). CT Colonography with Intravenous Contrast Material: Varied Appearances of Colorectal Carcinoma. RadioGraphics 25: 1321-1334 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kitano, S., Inomata, M., Sato, A., Yoshimura, K., Moriya, Y., for the Colorectal Cancer Study Group (CCSG) of Ja, (2005). Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35: 475-477 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shah, P R, Joseph, A, Haray, P N (2005). Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: learning curve and training implications. Postgrad. Med. J. 81: 537-540 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Petrelli, N. J., Abbruzzese, J., Mansfield, P., Minsky, B. (2005). Hepatic Resection: The Last Surgical Frontier for Colorectal Cancer. JCO 23: 4475-4477 [Full Text]  
• Wichmann, M. W., Huttl, T. P., Winter, H., Spelsberg, F., Angele, M. K., Heiss, M. M., Jauch, K.-W. (2005). Immunological Effects of Laparoscopic vs Open Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Study. Arch Surg 140: 692-697 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Morgenstern, L. (2005). Warning! Dangerous Curve Ahead: The Learning Curve. SURG INNOV 12: 101-103  
• (2004). Other articles noted. Evid. Based Med. 9: e5-e5 [Full Text]  
• Tinmouth, J., Tomlinson, G., Dalibon, N., Moutafis, M., Fischler, M., Nelson, H., Sargent, D. J. (2004). Laparoscopically Assisted versus Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer. NEJM 351: 933-934 [Full Text]  
• (2004). Laparoscopically Assisted Colectomy for Colon Cancer Validated. JWatch Gastroenterology 2004: 6-6 [Full Text]  
• Pappas, T. N., Jacobs, D. O. (2004). Laparoscopic Resection for Colon Cancer -- The End of the Beginning?. NEJM 350: 2091-2092 [Full Text]