The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 350:221-231 January 15, 2004 Number 3
NextNext

A Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Gregg W. Stone, M.D., Stephen G. Ellis, M.D., David A. Cox, M.D., James Hermiller, M.D., Charles O'Shaughnessy, M.D., James Tift Mann, M.D., Mark Turco, M.D., Ronald Caputo, M.D., Patrick Bergin, M.D., Joel Greenberg, M.D., Jeffrey J. Popma, M.D., Mary E. Russell, M.D., for the TAXUS-IV Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Lee, T. H.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Restenosis after coronary stenting necessitates repeated percutaneous or surgical revascularization procedures. The delivery of paclitaxel to the site of vascular injury may reduce the incidence of neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis.

Methods At 73 U.S. centers, we enrolled 1314 patients who were receiving a stent in a single, previously untreated coronary-artery stenosis (vessel diameter, 2.5 to 3.75 mm; lesion length, 10 to 28 mm) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. A total of 652 patients were randomly assigned to receive a bare-metal stent, and 662 to receive an identical-appearing, slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent. Angiographic follow-up was prespecified at nine months in 732 patients.

Results In terms of base-line characteristics, the two groups were well matched. Diabetes mellitus was present in 24.2 percent of patients; the mean reference-vessel diameter was 2.75 mm, and the mean lesion length was 13.4 mm. A mean of 1.08 stents (length, 21.8 mm) were implanted per patient. The rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at nine months was reduced from 12.0 percent with the implantation of a bare-metal stent to 4.7 percent with the implantation of a paclitaxel-eluting stent (relative risk, 0.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.59; P<0.001). Target-lesion revascularization was required in 3.0 percent of the group that received a paclitaxel-eluting stent, as compared with 11.3 percent of the group that received a bare-metal stent (relative risk, 0.27; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.43; P<0.001). The rate of angiographic restenosis was reduced from 26.6 percent to 7.9 percent with the paclitaxel-eluting stent (relative risk, 0.30; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.46; P<0.001). The nine-month composite rates of death from cardiac causes or myocardial infarction (4.7 percent and 4.3 percent, respectively) and stent thrombosis (0.6 percent and 0.8 percent, respectively) were similar in the group that received a paclitaxel-eluting stent and the group that received a bare-metal stent.

Conclusions As compared with bare-metal stents, the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent is safe and markedly reduces the rates of clinical and angiographic restenosis at nine months.


Source Information

From the Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute, New York (G.W.S.); the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (S.G.E.); Mid Carolina Cardiology, Charlotte, N.C. (D.A.C.); St. Vincent's Hospital, Indianapolis (J.H.); Elyria Memorial Hospital, Elyria, Ohio (C.O.); WakeMed, Raleigh, N.C. (J.T.M.); Washington Adventist Hospital, Tacoma Park, Md. (M.T.); St. Joseph's Hospital, Syracuse, N.Y. (R.C.); Sacred Heart Medical Center, Eugene, Oreg. (P.B.); Florida Hospital, Orlando (J.G.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (J.J.P.); and Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass. (M.E.R.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Stone at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 55 E. 59th St., 6th Fl., New York, NY 10022, or at gstone{at}crf.org.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents
Ajani A. E., Waksman R., Stone G. W., Ellis S. G., Russell M. E.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2004; 350:2099-2100, May 13, 2004. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.