The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 351:1635-1644 October 14, 2004 Number 16
NextNext

Fresh Whole Blood versus Reconstituted Blood for Pump Priming in Heart Surgery in Infants
Steven S. Mou, M.D., Brett P. Giroir, M.D., Erica A. Molitor-Kirsch, M.D., Steven R. Leonard, M.D., Hisashi Nikaidoh, M.D., Frank Nizzi, D.O., Deborah A. Town, R.N., Lonnie C. Roy, Ph.D., William Scott, M.D., and Daniel Stromberg, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Edmunds, L. H.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background In an attempt to reduce the coagulopathic and inflammatory responses seen after cardiopulmonary bypass, the use of fresh whole blood during heart operations has become the standard of care for neonates and infants at many institutions. We compared the use of fresh whole blood with the use of a combination of packed red cells and fresh-frozen plasma (reconstituted blood) for priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.

Methods We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial involving children less than one year of age who underwent open-heart surgery. Patients were assigned to receive either fresh whole blood that had been collected not more than 48 hours previously (96 patients) or reconstituted blood (104 patients) for bypass-circuit priming. Clinical outcomes and serologic measures of systemic inflammation and myocardial injury were compared between the groups.

Results The group that received reconstituted blood had a shorter stay in the intensive care unit than the group that received fresh whole blood (70.5 hours vs. 97.0 hours, P=0.04). The group that received reconstituted blood also had a smaller cumulative fluid balance at 48 hours (–6.9 ml per kilogram of body weight vs. 28.8 ml per kilogram, P=0.003). Early postoperative chest-tube output, blood-product transfusion requirements, and levels of serum mediators of inflammation and cardiac troponin I were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions The use of fresh whole blood for cardiopulmonary bypass priming has no advantage over the use of a combination of packed red cells and fresh-frozen plasma during surgery for congenital heart disease. Moreover, circuit priming with fresh whole blood is associated with an increased length of stay in the intensive care unit and increased perioperative fluid overload.


Source Information

From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center (S.S.M., B.P.G., E.A.M.-K., S.R.L., H.N., D.A.T., L.C.R., W.S., D.S.); and Carter BloodCare (F.N.) — both in Dallas.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Stromberg at the Division of Cardiology, Children's Medical Center, 1935 Motor St., Dallas, TX 75235, or at daniel.stromberg{at}childrens.com.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Pump Priming in Heart Surgery in Infants
Hamilton M. S., Menitove J. E.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2005; 352:731, Feb 17, 2005. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.