The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 351:2481-2488 December 9, 2004 Number 24
NextNext

Prophylactic Use of an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Stefan H. Hohnloser, M.D., Karl Heinz Kuck, M.D., Paul Dorian, M.D., Robin S. Roberts, M.Tech., John R. Hampton, M.D., Robert Hatala, M.D., Eric Fain, M.D., Michael Gent, D.Sc., Stuart J. Connolly, M.D., for the DINAMIT Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Gillis, A. M.
-Editorial
 by Jauhar, S.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) therapy has been shown to improve survival in patients with various heart conditions who are at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias. Whether benefit occurs in patients early after myocardial infarction is unknown.

Methods We conducted the Defibrillator in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial, a randomized, open-label comparison of ICD therapy (in 332 patients) and no ICD therapy (in 342 patients) 6 to 40 days after a myocardial infarction. We enrolled patients who had reduced left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.35 or less) and impaired cardiac autonomic function (manifested as depressed heart-rate variability or an elevated average 24-hour heart rate on Holter monitoring). The primary outcome was mortality from any cause. Death from arrhythmia was a predefined secondary outcome.

Results During a mean (±SD) follow-up period of 30±13 months, there was no difference in overall mortality between the two treatment groups: of the 120 patients who died, 62 were in the ICD group and 58 in the control group (hazard ratio for death in the ICD group, 1.08; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 1.55; P=0.66). There were 12 deaths due to arrhythmia in the ICD group, as compared with 29 in the control group (hazard ratio in the ICD group, 0.42; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.83; P=0.009). In contrast, there were 50 deaths from nonarrhythmic causes in the ICD group and 29 in the control group (hazard ratio in the ICD group, 1.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.11 to 2.76; P=0.02).

Conclusions Prophylactic ICD therapy does not reduce overall mortality in high-risk patients who have recently had a myocardial infarction. Although ICD therapy was associated with a reduction in the rate of death due to arrhythmia, that was offset by an increase in the rate of death from nonarrhythmic causes.


Source Information

From J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt (S.H.H.), and St. Georg's Hospital, Hamburg (K.H.K.) — both in Germany; St. Michel's Hospital, Toronto (P.D.), and Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Center (R.S.R., M.G.) and McMaster University (S.J.C.), Hamilton, Ont. — all in Canada; University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom (J.R.H.); Slovak Cardiovascular Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic (R.H.); and St. Jude Medical, Sunnyvale, Calif. (E.F.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Hohnloser at the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, J.W. Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany, or at hohnloser{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator Therapy after Myocardial Infarction
Shah K. B., Gottlieb S. S., Steinbeck G., Andresen D., Senges J., Micheletta F., Natoli S., Iuliano L., Hohnloser S. H., Connolly S. J., Gent M., the DINAMIT Investigators
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1039-1041, Mar 10, 2005. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.