The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 352:1861-1872 May 5, 2005 Number 18
NextNext

Amiodarone versus Sotalol for Atrial Fibrillation
Bramah N. Singh, M.D., D.Sc., Steven N. Singh, M.D., Domenic J. Reda, Ph.D., X. Charlene Tang, M.D., Ph.D., Becky Lopez, R.N., Crystal L. Harris, Pharm.D., Ross D. Fletcher, M.D., Satish C. Sharma, M.D., J. Edwin Atwood, M.D., Alan K. Jacobson, M.D., H. Daniel Lewis, Jr., M.D., Dennis W. Raisch, Ph.D., Michael D. Ezekowitz, M.B., Ch.B., Ph.D., for the Sotalol Amiodarone Atrial Fibrillation Efficacy Trial (SAFE-T) Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The optimal pharmacologic means to restore and maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation remains controversial.

Methods In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 665 patients who were receiving anticoagulants and had persistent atrial fibrillation to receive amiodarone (267 patients), sotalol (261 patients), or placebo (137 patients) and monitored them for 1 to 4.5 years. The primary end point was the time to recurrence of atrial fibrillation beginning on day 28, determined by means of weekly transtelephonic monitoring.

Results Spontaneous conversion occurred in 27.1 percent of the amiodarone group, 24.2 percent of the sotalol group, and 0.8 percent of the placebo group, and direct-current cardioversion failed in 27.7 percent, 26.5 percent, and 32.1 percent, respectively. The median times to a recurrence of atrial f ibrillation were 487 days in the amiodarone group, 74 days in the sotalol group, and 6 days in the placebo group according to intention to treat and 809, 209, and 13 days, respectively, according to treatment received. Amiodarone was superior to sotalol (P<0.001) and to placebo (P<0.001), and sotalol was superior to placebo (P<0.001). In patients with ischemic heart disease, the median time to a recurrence of atrial fibrillation was 569 days with amiodarone therapy and 428 days with sotalol therapy (P=0.53). Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm significantly improved the quality of life and exercise capacity. There were no significant differences in major adverse events among the three groups.

Conclusions Amiodarone and sotalol are equally efficacious in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Amiodarone is superior for maintaining sinus rhythm, but both drugs have similar efficacy in patients with ischemic heart disease. Sustained sinus rhythm is associated with an improved quality of life and improved exercise performance.


Source Information

From the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Los Angeles, Calif. (B.N.S., B.L.); the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, D.C. (S.N.S., R.D.F.); the Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Ill. (D.J.R., X.C.T.); the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque, N.M. (C.L.H., D.W.R.); the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, R.I. (S.C.S.); Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C. (J.E.A.); the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif. (A.K.J.); the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Mo. (H.D.L.); and Hahnemann University and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Philadelphia — both in Philadelphia (M.D.E.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Singh at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center of West Los Angeles, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90073, or at bsingh{at}ucla.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Amiodarone versus Sotalol for Atrial Fibrillation
Rubinstein J., Zimetbaum P. J., Josephson M. E., Schlegel A., Desai K. R., Singh B. N., Singh S. N., Reda D.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2005; 353:627-630, Aug 11, 2005. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.