The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 352:2163-2173 May 26, 2005 Number 21
NextNext

Use of Exhaled Nitric Oxide Measurements to Guide Treatment in Chronic Asthma
Andrew D. Smith, M.B., Ch.B., Jan O. Cowan, Karen P. Brassett, G. Peter Herbison, M.Sc., and D. Robin Taylor, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-Supplementary Material

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Deykin, A.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background International guidelines for the treatment of asthma recommend adjusting the dose of inhaled corticosteroids on the basis of symptoms, bronchodilator requirements, and the results of pulmonary-function tests. Measurements of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) constitute a noninvasive marker that may be a useful alternative for the adjustment of inhaled-corticosteroid treatment.

Methods In a single-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 97 patients with asthma who had been regularly receiving treatment with inhaled corticosteroids to have their corticosteroid dose adjusted, in a stepwise fashion, on the basis of either FENO measurements or an algorithm based on conventional guidelines. After the optimal dose was determined (phase 1), patients were followed up for 12 months (phase 2). The primary outcome was the frequency of exacerbations of asthma; the secondary outcome was the mean daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid.

Results Forty-six patients in the FENO group and 48 in the group whose asthma was treated according to conventional guidelines (the control group) completed the study. The final mean daily doses of fluticasone, the inhaled corticosteroid that was used, were 370 µg per day for the FENO group (95 percent confidence interval, 263 to 477) and 641 µg per day for the control group (95 percent confidence interval, 526 to 756; P=0.003), a difference of 270 µg per day (95 percent confidence interval, 112 to 430). The rates of exacerbation were 0.49 episode per patient per year in the FENO group (95 percent confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.78) and 0.90 in the control group (95 percent confidence interval, 0.31 to 1.49), representing a nonsignificant reduction of 45.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval for mean difference, –78.6 percent to 54.5 percent) in the FENO group. There were no significant differences in other markers of asthma control, use of oral prednisone, pulmonary function, or levels of airway inflammation (sputum eosinophils).

Conclusions With the use of FENO measurements, maintenance doses of inhaled corticosteroids may be significantly reduced without compromising asthma control.


Source Information

From the Respiratory Research Unit, Department of Medicine (A.D.S., J.O.C., K.P.B., D.R.T.), and the Department of Preventive and Social Medicine (G.P.H.), Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Taylor at the Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, P.O. Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand, or at robin.taylor{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Asthma
Silkoff P. E., Corbetta L., Fabbri L. M., Currie G. P., Lee D. K.C., Smith A. D., Taylor D. R.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2005; 353:732-733, Aug 18, 2005. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.