The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 352:2705-2713 June 30, 2005 Number 26
NextNext

Daclizumab to Prevent Rejection after Cardiac Transplantation
Ray E. Hershberger, M.D., Randall C. Starling, M.D., M.P.H., Howard J. Eisen, M.D., Claes-Håkan Bergh, M.D., Ph.D., Robert L. Kormos, M.D., Robert B. Love, M.D., Adrian Van Bakel, M.D., Ph.D., Robert D. Gordon, M.D., Rina Popat, B.S., Louise Cockey, M.S., and Richard D. Mamelok, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Hosenpud, J. D.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-2 receptor, reduced the risk of rejection without increasing the risk of infection among renal-transplant recipients and, in a single-center trial, among cardiac-transplant recipients. We conducted a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to confirm these results in cardiac-transplant patients.

Methods We randomly assigned 434 recipients of a first cardiac transplant treated with standard immunosuppression (cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids) to receive five doses of daclizumab or placebo. The primary end point was a composite of moderate or severe cellular rejection, hemodynamically significant graft dysfunction, a second transplantation, or death or loss to follow-up within six months.

Results By six months, 104 of 218 patients in the placebo group had reached the primary end point, as compared with 77 of the 216 patients in the daclizumab group (47.7 percent vs. 35.6 percent, P=0.007), a 12.1 percent absolute risk reduction and a 25 percent relative reduction. The rate of rejection was lower in the daclizumab group than in the placebo group (41.3 percent vs. 25.5 percent). Among patients reaching the primary end point, the median time to the end point was almost three times as long in the daclizumab group as in the placebo group during the first 6 months (61 vs. 21 days) and at 1 year (96 vs. 26 days). More patients in the daclizumab group than in the placebo group died of infection (6 vs. 0) when they received concomitant cytolytic therapy.

Conclusions Daclizumab was efficacious as prophylaxis against acute cellular rejection after cardiac transplantation. Because of the excess risk of death, concurrent or anticipated use of cytolytic therapy with daclizumab should be avoided.


Source Information

From Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (R.E.H.); Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (R.C.S.); Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia (H.J.E.); Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteberg, Sweden (C.-H.B.); University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh (R.L.K.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (R.B.L.); Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (A.V.B.); and Roche Laboratories, Nutley, N.J. (R.D.G., R.P., L.C., R.D.M.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Hershberger at the Department of Medicine/Cardiology, UHN-62, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239, or at hershber{at}ohsu.edu.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.