The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 353:1564-1573 October 13, 2005 Number 15
NextNext

Asbestos Exposure, Pleural Mesothelioma, and Serum Osteopontin Levels
Harvey I. Pass, M.D., Dan Lott, B.S., Fulvio Lonardo, M.D., Michael Harbut, M.D., Zhandong Liu, Ph.D., Naimei Tang, Ph.D., Michele Carbone, M.D., Ph.D., Craig Webb, Ph.D., and Anil Wali, Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Cullen, M. R.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background We investigated the presence of osteopontin in pleural mesothelioma and determined serum osteopontin levels in three populations: subjects without cancer who were exposed to asbestos, subjects without cancer who were not exposed to asbestos, and patients with pleural mesothelioma who were exposed to asbestos.

Methods A group of 69 subjects with asbestos-related nonmalignant pulmonary disease were compared with 45 subjects without exposure to asbestos and 76 patients with surgically staged pleural mesothelioma. Tumor tissue was examined for osteopontin by immunohistochemical analysis, and serum osteopontin levels were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results There were no significant differences in mean (±SE) serum osteopontin levels between age-matched subjects with exposure to asbestos and subjects without exposure to asbestos (30±3 ng per milliliter and 20±4 ng per milliliter, respectively; P=0.06). In the group with exposure to asbestos, elevated serum osteopontin levels were associated with pulmonary plaques and fibrosis (56±13 ng per milliliter) but not with normal radiographic findings (21±5 ng per milliliter), plaques alone (23±3 ng per milliliter), or fibrosis alone (32±7 ng per milliliter) (P=0.004). Serum osteopontin levels were significantly higher in the group with pleural mesothelioma than in the group with exposure to asbestos (133±10 ng per milliliter vs. 30±3 ng per milliliter, P<0.001). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed osteopontin staining of the tumor cells in 36 of 38 samples of pleural mesothelioma. An analysis of serum osteopontin levels comparing the receiver-operating-characteristic curve in the group exposed to asbestos with that of the group with mesothelioma had a sensitivity of 77.6 percent and a specificity of 85.5 percent at a cutoff value of 48.3 ng of osteopontin per milliliter. Subgroup analysis comparing patients with stage I mesothelioma with subjects with exposure to asbestos revealed a sensitivity of 84.6 percent and a specificity of 88.4 percent at a cutoff value of 62.4 ng of osteopontin per milliliter.

Conclusions Serum osteopontin levels can be used to distinguish persons with exposure to asbestos who do not have cancer from those with exposure to asbestos who have pleural mesothelioma.


Source Information

From the Departments of Surgery (H.I.P., N.T., A.W.), Pathology (F.L.), Medicine (M.H.), and Computer Science (Z.L.) and the Center for Molecular Genetics (D.L.), Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, John A. Dingell Veterans Hospital, Detroit; the Department of Pathology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University, Maywood, Ill. (M.C.); and the Laboratory of Tumor Metastasis and Angiogenesis, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Mich. (C.W.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Pass at the NYU School of Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 530 1st Ave., Suite 9V, New York, NY 10016, or at harvey.pass{at}med.nyu.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Asbestos Exposure and Serum Osteopontin
O'Regan A. W., Serlin D., Berman J. S., Hiraki A., Aoe K., Ueoka H., Pass H. I., Carbone M., Wali A.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2006; 354:304-305, Jan 19, 2006. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.