The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 353:2121-2134 November 17, 2005 Number 20
NextNext

Effects of Rimonabant on Metabolic Risk Factors in Overweight Patients with Dyslipidemia
Jean-Pierre Després, Ph.D., Alain Golay, M.D., Lars Sjöström, M.D., Ph.D., for the Rimonabant in Obesity–Lipids Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Yanovski, S. Z.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Rimonabant, a selective cannabinoid-1 receptor (CB1) blocker, has been shown to reduce body weight and improve cardiovascular risk factors in obese patients. The Rimonabant in Obesity–Lipids (RIO-Lipids) study examined the effects of rimonabant on metabolic risk factors, including adiponectin levels, in high-risk patients who are overweight or obese and have dyslipidemia.

Methods We randomly assigned 1036 overweight or obese patients (body-mass index [the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters], 27 to 40) with untreated dyslipidemia (triglyceride levels >1.69 to 7.90 mmol per liter, or a ratio of cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol of >4.5 among women and >5 among men) to double-blinded therapy with either placebo or rimonabant at a dose of 5 mg or 20 mg daily for 12 months in addition to a hypocaloric diet.

Results The rates of completion of the study were 62.6 percent, 60.3 percent, and 63.9 percent in the placebo group, the group receiving 5 mg of rimonabant, and the group receiving 20 mg of rimonabant, respectively. The most frequent adverse events resulting in discontinuation of the drug were depression, anxiety, and nausea. As compared with placebo, rimonabant at a dose of 20 mg was associated with a significant (P<0.001) mean weight loss (repeated-measures method, –6.7±0.5 kg, and last-observation-carried-forward analyses, –5.4±0.4 kg), reduction in waist circumference (repeated-measures method, –5.8±0.5 cm, and last-observation-carried-forward analyses, –4.7±0.5 cm), increase in HDL cholesterol (repeated-measures method, +10.0±1.6 percent, and last-observation-carried-forward analyses, +8.1±1.5 percent), and reduction in triglycerides (repeated-measures method, –13.0±3.5 percent, and last-observation-carried-forward analyses, –12.4±3.2 percent). Rimonabant at a dose of 20 mg also resulted in an increase in plasma adiponectin levels (repeated-measures method, 57.7 percent, and last-observation-carried-forward analyses, 46.2 percent; P<0.001), for a change that was partly independent of weight loss alone.

Conclusions Selective CB1-receptor blockade with rimonabant significantly reduces body weight and waist circumference and improves the profile of several metabolic risk factors in high-risk patients who are overweight or obese and have an atherogenic dyslipidemia.


Source Information

From the Quebec Heart Institute, Laval Hospital Research Center, and the Division of Kinesiology, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Ste.-Foy, Que., Canada (J.-P.D.); the Service of Therapeutic Education for Chronic Diseases, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva (A.G.); and the Department of Body Composition and Metabolism, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden (L.S.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Després at the Quebec Heart Institute, Laval Hospital Research Center, Pavilion Marguerite-D'Youville, 4th Fl., 2725 Chemin Ste.-Foy, Ste.-Foy, QC G1V 4G5, Canada, or at jean-pierre.despres{at}crhl.ulaval.ca.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Metabolic Risk Factors, Drugs, and Obesity
Padwal R., Majumdar S., Després J.-P., Golay A., Sjöström L.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2006; 354:974-975, Mar 2, 2006. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.