The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 354:1001-1010 March 9, 2006 Number 10
NextNext

A Comparison of Entecavir and Lamivudine for HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B
Ting-Tsung Chang, M.D., Robert G. Gish, M.D., Robert de Man, M.D., Adrian Gadano, M.D., José Sollano, M.D., You-Chen Chao, M.D., Anna S. Lok, M.D., Kwang-Hyub Han, M.D., Zachary Goodman, M.D., Ph.D., Jin Zhu, Ph.D., Anne Cross, Ph.D., Deborah DeHertogh, M.D., Richard Wilber, M.D., Richard Colonno, Ph.D., David Apelian, M.D., Ph.D., for the BEHoLD AI463022 Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Hoofnagle, J. H.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
ABSTRACT

Background Entecavir is a potent and selective guanosine analogue with significant activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV).

Methods In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 715 patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–positive chronic hepatitis B who had not previously received a nucleoside analogue to receive either 0.5 mg of entecavir or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily for a minimum of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was histologic improvement (a decrease by at least two points in the Knodell necroinflammatory score, without worsening of fibrosis) at week 48. Secondary end points included a reduction in the serum HBV DNA level, HBeAg loss and seroconversion, and normalization of the alanine aminotransferase level.

Results Histologic improvement after 48 weeks occurred in 226 of 314 patients in the entecavir group (72 percent) and 195 of 314 patients in the lamivudine group (62 percent, P=0.009). More patients in the entecavir group than in the lamivudine group had undetectable serum HBV DNA levels according to a polymerase-chain-reaction assay (67 percent vs. 36 percent, P<0.001) and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels (68 percent vs. 60 percent, P=0.02). The mean reduction in serum HBV DNA from baseline to week 48 was greater with entecavir than with lamivudine (6.9 vs. 5.4 log [on a base-10 scale] copies per milliliter, P<0.001). HBeAg seroconversion occurred in 21 percent of entecavir-treated patients and 18 percent of those treated with lamivudine (P=0.33). No viral resistance to entecavir was detected. Safety was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions Among patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, the rates of histologic, virologic, and biochemical improvement are significantly higher with entecavir than with lamivudine. The safety profile of the two agents is similar, and there is no evidence of viral resistance to entecavir. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00035633 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)


Source Information

From the National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan, Taiwan (T.-T.C.); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco (R.G.G.); University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.); Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires (A.G.); the University of Santo Tomas, Manila, the Philippines (J.S.); Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-C.C.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.S.L.); Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (K.-H.H.); Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, D.C. (Z.G.); Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Wallingford, Conn. (J.Z., A.C., R.W., R.C.); the University of Connecticut, Farmington (D.D.); and GlobeImmune, Louisville, Colo. (D.A.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Chang at the Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, 138 Sheng-Li Rd., Tainan, Taiwan 704, or at ttchang{at}mail.ncku.edu.tw.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.