The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 354:131-140 January 12, 2006 Number 2
NextNext

Efficacy and Safety of Benazepril for Advanced Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Fan Fan Hou, M.D., Ph.D., Xun Zhang, M.D., Guo Hua Zhang, M.D., Ph.D., Di Xie, M.D., Ping Yan Chen, M.D., Wei Ru Zhang, M.D., Ph.D., Jian Ping Jiang, M.D., Min Liang, M.D., Ph.D., Guo Bao Wang, M.D., Zheng Rong Liu, M.D., and Ren Wen Geng, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Hebert, L. A.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors provide renal protection in patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency (serum creatinine level, 3.0 mg per deciliter or less). We assessed the efficacy and safety of benazepril in patients without diabetes who had advanced renal insufficiency.

Methods We enrolled 422 patients in a randomized, double-blind study. After an eight-week run-in period, 104 patients with serum creatinine levels of 1.5 to 3.0 mg per deciliter (group 1) received 20 mg of benazepril per day, whereas 224 patients with serum creatinine levels of 3.1 to 5.0 mg per deciliter (group 2) were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg of benazepril per day (112 patients) or placebo (112 patients) and then followed for a mean of 3.4 years. All patients received conventional antihypertensive therapy. The primary outcome was the composite of a doubling of the serum creatinine level, end-stage renal disease, or death. Secondary end points included changes in the level of proteinuria and the rate of progression of renal disease.

Results Of 102 patients in group 1, 22 (22 percent) reached the primary end point, as compared with 44 of 108 patients given benazepril in group 2 (41 percent) and 65 of 107 patients given placebo in group 2 (60 percent). As compared with placebo, benazepril was associated with a 43 percent reduction in the risk of the primary end point in group 2 (P=0.005). This benefit did not appear to be attributable to blood-pressure control. Benazepril therapy was associated with a 52 percent reduction in the level of proteinuria and a reduction of 23 percent in the rate of decline in renal function. The overall incidence of major adverse events in the benazepril and placebo subgroups of group 2 was similar.

Conclusions Benazepril conferred substantial renal benefits in patients without diabetes who had advanced renal insufficiency. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00270426 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)


Source Information

From the Renal Division, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Hou at the Renal Division, Nanfang Hospital, 1838 N. Guangzhou Ave., Guangzhou 510515, China, or at ffhou{at}public.guangzhou.gd.cn.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Benazepril for Advanced Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Bloom J. M., Jaber B. L., Madias N. E., Hou F. F., Zhang X.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2006; 354:1530-1531, Apr 6, 2006. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.