The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 354:2103-2111 May 18, 2006 Number 20
NextNext

HER2 and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Kathleen I. Pritchard, M.D., Lois E. Shepherd, M.D., Frances P. O'Malley, M.D., Irene L. Andrulis, Ph.D., Dongsheng Tu, Ph.D., Vivien H. Bramwell, M.B., B.S., Mark N. Levine, M.D., for the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Piccart-Gebhart, M. J.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2, also called HER2/neu) gene and overexpression of its product in breast-cancer cells may be associated with responsiveness to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens.

Methods In the randomized, controlled Mammary.5 trial, we studied 639 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens obtained from 710 premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer who had received either cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy. HER2 amplification or overexpression was evaluated with the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemical analysis, and polymerase-chain-reaction analysis.

Results Amplification of HER2 was associated with a poor prognosis regardless of the type of treatment. In patients whose tumors showed amplification of HER2, CEF was superior to CMF when assessed on the basis of relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.80; P=0.003) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.42 to 1.02; P=0.06). For women whose tumors lacked amplification of HER2, CEF did not improve relapse-free survival (hazard ratio for relapse, 0.91; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 1.18; P=0.49) or overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.06; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.44; P=0.68). The adjusted hazard ratio for the interaction between treatment and HER2 amplification was 1.96 for relapse-free survival (95 percent confidence interval, 1.15 to 3.36; P=0.01) and 2.04 for overall survival (95 percent confidence interval, 1.14 to 3.65; P=0.02).

Conclusions Amplification of HER2 in breast-cancer cells is associated with clinical responsiveness to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. (cancer.gov number, NCI-V90-0027.)


Source Information

From the Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto (K.I.P.); Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (L.E.S., D.T.); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto (F.P.O., I.L.A.); the Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, University of Toronto, and the Fred A. Litwin Centre for Cancer Genetics, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto (I.L.A.); the Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, and Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alta. (V.H.B.); and the Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (M.N.L.) — all in Canada.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Pritchard at Clinical Trials and Epidemiology, Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada, or at kathy.pritchard{at}sunnybrook.ca.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer
Wilson K. S., Pritchard K. I., Bramwell V. H., Levine M. N., the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group , Piccart-Gebhart M. J.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2006; 355:845-846, Aug 24, 2006. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.