The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 2006;355(4):429.

Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 354:832-840 February 23, 2006 Number 8
NextNext

A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Itopride in Functional Dyspepsia
Gerald Holtmann, M.D., Nicholas J. Talley, M.D., Ph.D., Tobias Liebregts, M.D., Birgit Adam, M.D., and Christopher Parow, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Longstreth, G. F.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The treatment of patients with functional dyspepsia remains unsatisfactory. We assessed the efficacy of itopride, a dopamine D2 antagonist with acetylcholinesterase effects, in patients with functional dyspepsia.

Methods Patients with functional dyspepsia were randomly assigned to receive either itopride (50, 100, or 200 mg three times daily) or placebo. After eight weeks of treatment, three primary efficacy end points were analyzed: the change from baseline in the severity of symptoms of functional dyspepsia (as assessed by the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire), patients' global assessment of efficacy (the proportion of patients without symptoms or with marked improvement), and the severity of pain or fullness as rated on a five-grade scale.

Results We randomly assigned 554 patients; 523 had outcome data and could be included in the analyses. After eight weeks, 41 percent of the patients receiving placebo were symptom-free or had marked improvement, as compared with 57 percent, 59 percent, and 64 percent receiving itopride at a dose of 50, 100, or 200 mg three times daily, respectively (P<0.05 for all comparisons between placebo and itopride). Although the symptom score improved significantly in all four groups, an overall analysis revealed that itopride was significantly superior to placebo, with the greatest symptom-score improvement in the 100- and 200-mg groups (–6.24 and –6.27, vs. –4.50 in the placebo group; P=0.05). Analysis of the combined end point of pain and fullness showed that itopride yielded a greater rate of response than placebo (73 percent vs. 63 percent, P=0.04).

Conclusions Itopride significantly improves symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00272103 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)


Source Information

From the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and General Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide (G.H., T.L., B.A.); and the Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith (N.J.T.) — both in Australia; the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn. (N.J.T.); and Global Scientific Support, Abbott, Ludwigshafen, Germany (C.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Holtmann at the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and General Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia, or at gholtman{at}mail.rah.sa.gov.au.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Itopride for Functional Dyspepsia
Taylor K. M., Harris A. W., Holtmann G., Liebregts T., Talley N. J.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2392, Jun 1, 2006. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.