The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 355:41-50 July 6, 2006 Number 1
NextNext

Hospital Volume and the Outcomes of Mechanical Ventilation
Jeremy M. Kahn, M.D., Christopher H. Goss, M.D., Patrick J. Heagerty, Ph.D., Andrew A. Kramer, Ph.D., Chelsea R. O'Brien, R.N., and Gordon D. Rubenfeld, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background An increased volume of patients is associated with improved survival in numerous high-risk medical and surgical conditions. The relationship between the number of patients admitted (hospital volume) and outcome among patients with critical illnesses is unknown.

Methods We analyzed data from 20,241 nonsurgical patients receiving mechanical ventilation at 37 acute care hospitals in the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation clinical information system from 2002 through 2003. Multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for the severity of illness and other differences in the case mix.

Results An increase in hospital volume was associated with improved survival among patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital. Admission to a hospital in the highest quartile according to volume (i.e., >400 patients receiving mechanical ventilation per year) was associated with a 37 percent reduction in the adjusted odds of death in the ICU as compared with admission to hospitals in the lowest quartile (≤150 patients receiving mechanical ventilation per year, P<0.001). In-hospital mortality was similarly reduced (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.83; P<0.001). A typical patient in a hospital in a low-volume quartile would have an adjusted in-hospital mortality of 34.2 percent as compared with 25.5 percent in a hospital in a high-volume quartile. Among survivors, there were no significant trends in the length of stay in the ICU or the hospital.

Conclusions Mechanical ventilation of patients in a hospital with a high case volume is associated with reduced mortality. Further research is needed to determine the mechanism of the relationship between volume and outcome among patients with a critical illness.


Source Information

From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (J.M.K., C.H.G., C.R.O., G.D.R.) and the Department of Biostatistics (P.J.H.), University of Washington, Seattle; and the Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, Mo. (A.A.K.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Rubenfeld at Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Box 359762, 325 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA 98104, or at nodrog{at}u.washington.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Mechanical Ventilation
Hughes-Davies T., Arah O. A., Kahn J. M., Rubenfeld G. D.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1617-1619, Oct 12, 2006. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.