FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 355:1895-1902 November 2, 2006 Number 18 Next

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text PowerPoint Slide Set Perspective by Fisher, E. S. Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited E-mail When Letters Appear PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Pay for performance has increasingly become the subject of intense interest and debate, both of which have been heightened as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services moves closer to adopting this approach for Medicare. Although many claims have been made for the effectiveness of this approach, the extent of its national penetration remains unknown.

Methods We surveyed a sample of 252 health maintenance organizations (HMOs) (response rate, 96%) drawn from 41 metropolitan areas across the nation about use of pay for performance. We determined the prevalence of pay-for-performance programs, detailed the features of such programs, and examined the adoption of pay for performance as a function of the characteristics of both the health plans and markets.

Results More than half the HMOs, representing more than 80% of persons enrolled, use pay for performance in their provider contracts. Of the 126 health plans with pay-for-performance programs, nearly 90% had programs for physicians and 38% had programs for hospitals. Use of pay for performance was statistically associated with geographic region, use of primary care providers (PCPs) as gatekeepers, use of capitation to pay PCPs, and whether the plans themselves received bonuses or penalties according to performance.

Conclusions Pay for performance is now commonly used by HMOs, especially those that are situated to assign responsibility for a particular patient to a PCP or medical group. As the design of Medicare with pay for performance moves forward, it will be important to leverage the early experience of pay for performance in the commercial market.

Source Information

From the Departments of Health Policy and Management (M.B.R., A.M.E.) and Biostatistics (S.-L.T.N.), Harvard School of Public Health; the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School (B.E.L., S.-L.T.N., R.G.F., A.M.E.); the Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (B.E.L.); and the Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital (A.M.E.) — all in Boston.

Full Text of this Article

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Pearson, S. D., Schneider, E. C., Kleinman, K. P., Coltin, K. L., Singer, J. A. (2008). The Impact Of Pay-For-Performance On Health Care Quality In Massachusetts, 2001-2003. Health Aff (Millwood) 27: 1167-1176 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• O'Brien, S. M., DeLong, E. R., Peterson, E. D. (2008). Impact of Case Volume on Hospital Performance Assessment. Arch Intern Med 168: 1277-1284 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bhattacharyya, T., Mehta, P., Freiberg, A. A. (2008). Hospital Characteristics Associated with Success in a Pay-for-Performance Program in Orthopaedic Surgery. JBJS 90: 1240-1243 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Landon, B. E., Normand, S.-L. T. (2008). Performance Measurement in the Small Office Practice: Challenges and Potential Solutions. ANN INTERN MED 148: 353-357 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Frieden, T. R., Mostashari, F. (2008). Health Care as If Health Mattered. JAMA 299: 950-952 [Full Text]  
• Wilson, I. B, Landon, B. E, Marsden, P. V, Hirschhorn, L. R, McInnes, K., Ding, L., Cleary, P. D (2007). Correlations among measures of quality in HIV care in the United States: cross sectional study. BMJ 335: 1085-1085 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rosenthal, M. B., Landon, B. E., Howitt, K., Song, H. R., Epstein, A. M. (2007). Climbing Up The Pay-For-Performance Learning Curve: Where Are The Early Adopters Now?. Health Aff (Millwood) 26: 1674-1682 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chien, A. T., Chin, M. H., Davis, A. M., Casalino, L. P. (2007). Pay for Performance, Public Reporting, and Racial Disparities in Health Care: How Are Programs Being Designed?. Med Care Res Rev 64: 283S-304S [Abstract]  
• Mandel, K. E., Kotagal, U. R. (2007). Pay for Performance Alone Cannot Drive Quality. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161: 650-655 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Profit, J., Petersen, L. A. (2007). Pay for Performance Is Growing Up. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161: 713-714 [Full Text]  
• Chien, A. T., Dudley, R. A. (2007). Pay-for-Performance in Pediatrics: Proceed With Caution. Pediatrics 120: 186-188 [Full Text]  
• Himmelfarb, J., Berns, A., Szczech, L., Wesson, D. (2007). Cost, Quality, and Value: The Changing Political Economy of Dialysis Care. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18: 2021-2027 [Full Text]  
• Casalino, L. P., Elster, A., Eisenberg, A., Lewis, E., Montgomery, J., Ramos, D. (2007). Will Pay-For-Performance And Quality Reporting Affect Health Care Disparities?. Health Aff (Millwood) 26: w405-w414 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Davis, K. (2007). Paying for Care Episodes and Care Coordination. NEJM 356: 1166-1168 [Full Text]  
• Sinsky, C. A., Sandy, L. G., Ile, M., Rosenthal, M. B., Landon, B. E., Epstein, A. M. (2007). Pay for Performance in Commercial HMOs. NEJM 356: 872-873 [Full Text]  
• Rosenthal, M. B., Dudley, R. A. (2007). Pay-for-Performance: Will the Latest Payment Trend Improve Care?. JAMA 297: 740-744 [Full Text]  
• Epstein, A. M. (2007). Pay for Performance at the Tipping Point. NEJM 356: 515-517 [Full Text]