Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis with a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter
Bruno Scheller, M.D., Christoph Hehrlein, M.D., Wolfgang Bocksch, M.D., Wolfgang Rutsch, M.D., Dariush Haghi, M.D., Ulrich Dietz, M.D., Michael Böhm, M.D., and Ulrich Speck, Ph.D.
Background Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis is hamperedby a high incidence of recurrent in-stent restenosis. We assessedthe efficacy and safety of a paclitaxel-coated balloon in thissetting.
Methods We enrolled 52 patients with in-stent restenosis ina randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial to compare theeffects of a balloon catheter coated with paclitaxel (3 µgper square millimeter of balloon surface area) with those ofan uncoated balloon catheter in coronary angioplasty. The primaryend point was late luminal loss as seen on angiography. Secondaryend points included the rates of restenosis (a binary variable)and major adverse cardiac events.
Results Multivessel disease was present in 80% of patients inboth groups. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed no significantdifferences in baseline measures. At 6 months, angiography showedthat the mean (±SD) in-segment late luminal loss was0.74±0.86 mm in the uncoated-balloon group versus 0.03±0.48mm in the coated-balloon group (P=0.002). A total of 10 of 23patients (43%) in the uncoated-balloon group had restenosis,as compared with 1 of 22 patients (5%) in the coated-balloongroup (P=0.002). At 12 months, the rate of major adverse cardiacevents was 31% in the uncoated-balloon group and 4% in the coated-balloongroup (P=0.01). This difference was primarily due to the needfor target-lesion revascularization in six patients in the uncoated-balloongroup (P=0.02).
Conclusions Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coatedballoon catheters significantly reduced the incidence of restenosis.These data suggest that the inhibition of restenosis by localdrug delivery may not require stent implantation and sustaineddrug release at the site of injury. (ClinicalTrials.gov number,NCT00106587
[ClinicalTrials.gov]
.)
Source Information
From Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar (B.S., M.B.); Universitätsklinikum, Freiburg (C.H.); Campus Virchow-Klinikum (W.B.) and Campus Charité Mitte (W.R., U.S.), Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin; Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Ruprecht Karls Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim (D.H.); and Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, Wiesbaden (U.D.) — all in Germany. This article was published at www.nejm.org on November 13, 2006.
Address reprint requests to Dr. Scheller at the Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany, or at bruno.scheller{at}uniklinikum-saarland.de.
Mukherjee, D.
(2008). Optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis after BMS--DES, coated balloon, or scalpel?. Eur Heart J
29: 1595-1596
[Full Text]
Ellis, S. G., O'Shaughnessy, C. D., Martin, S. L., Kent, K., McGarry, T., Turco, M. A., Kereiakes, D. J., Popma, J. J., Friedman, M., Koglin, J., Stone, G. W., for the TAXUS V ISR Investigators,
(2008). Two-year clinical outcomes after paclitaxel-eluting stent or brachytherapy treatment for bare metal stent restenosis: the TAXUS V ISR trial. Eur Heart J
29: 1625-1634
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tharp, D.L., Wamhoff, B.R., Wulff, H., Raman, G., Cheong, A., Bowles, D.K.
(2008). Local Delivery of the KCa3.1 Blocker, TRAM-34, Prevents Acute Angioplasty-Induced Coronary Smooth Muscle Phenotypic Modulation and Limits Stenosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.
28: 1084-1089
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tepe, G., Zeller, T., Albrecht, T., Heller, S., Schwarzwalder, U., Beregi, J.-P., Claussen, M.D. C. D., Oldenburg, A., Scheller, B., Speck, U.
(2008). Local Delivery of Paclitaxel to Inhibit Restenosis during Angioplasty of the Leg. NEJM
358: 689-699
[Abstract][Full Text]
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asso, , 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Upda, , King, S. B. III, Smith, S. C. Jr, Hirshfeld, J. W. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Morrison, D. A., Williams, D. O.
(2008). 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol
51: 172-209
[Full Text]
King, S. B. III, Smith, S. C. Jr, Hirshfeld, J. W. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Morrison, D. A., Williams, D. O., 2005 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, , Smith, S. C. Jr, Feldman, T. E., Hirshfeld, J. W. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Kern, M. J., King, S. B. III, Morrison, D. A., O'Neill, W. W., Schaff, H. V., Whitlow, P. L., Williams, D. O., Smith, S. C. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Adams, C. D., Anderson, J. L., Buller, C. E., Creager, M. A., Ettinger, S. M., Halperin, J. L., Hunt, S. A., Krumholz, H. M., Kushner, F. G., Lytle, B. W., Nishimura, R., Page, R. L., Riegel, B., Tarkington, L. G., Yancy, C. W.
(2008). 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee. Circulation
117: 261-295
[Full Text]
White, C. J., Gray, W. A.
(2007). Endovascular Therapies for Peripheral Arterial Disease: An Evidence-Based Review. Circulation
116: 2203-2215
[Abstract][Full Text]
Windecker, S., Meier, B.
(2007). Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis. Circulation
116: 1952-1965
[Full Text]
Zeller, T.
(2007). Current state of endovascular treatment of femoro-popliteal artery disease. Vasc Med
12: 223-234
[Abstract]
Scheller, B., Speck, U., Bohm, M.
(2007). Prevention of restenosis: is angioplasty the answer?. Heart
93: 539-541
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sun, J. C.J., Eikelboom, J. W., Agostoni, P., Sangiorgi, G. M., Biondi-Zoccai, G. G., Scheller, B., Bohm, M., Camenzind, E.
(2007). Treatment of Restenosis with a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter. NEJM
356: 1071-1073
[Full Text]
Lindsay, A.
(2007). JournalScan. Heart
93: 409-410
[Full Text]
Camenzind, E.
(2006). Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis -- Back to the Future?. NEJM
355: 2149-2151
[Full Text]