The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 356:998-1008 March 8, 2007 Number 10
NextNext

Safety and Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents
Gregg W. Stone, M.D., Jeffrey W. Moses, M.D., Stephen G. Ellis, M.D., Joachim Schofer, M.D., Keith D. Dawkins, M.D., Marie-Claude Morice, M.D., Antonio Colombo, M.D., Erick Schampaert, M.D., Eberhard Grube, M.D., Ajay J. Kirtane, M.D., Donald E. Cutlip, M.D., Martin Fahy, M.Sc., Stuart J. Pocock, Ph.D., Roxana Mehran, M.D., and Martin B. Leon, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-Supplementary Material

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Maisel, W. H.
-Perspective
 by Farb, A.
-Editorial
 by Curfman, G. D.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The safety of drug-eluting stents has been called into question by recent reports of increased stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and death. Such studies have been inconclusive because of their insufficient size, the use of historical controls, a limited duration of follow-up, and a lack of access to original source data.

Methods We performed a pooled analysis of data from four double-blind trials in which 1748 patients were randomly assigned to receive either sirolimus-eluting stents or bare-metal stents and five double-blind trials in which 3513 patients were randomly assigned to receive either paclitaxel-eluting stents or bare-metal stents; we then analyzed the major clinical end points of the trials.

Results The 4-year rates of stent thrombosis were 1.2% in the sirolimus-stent group versus 0.6% in the bare-metal–stent group (P=0.20) and 1.3% in the paclitaxel-stent group versus 0.9% in the bare-metal–stent group (P=0.30). However, after 1 year, there were five episodes of stent thrombosis in patients with sirolimus-eluting stents versus none in patients with bare-metal stents (P=0.025) and nine episodes in patients with paclitaxel-eluting stents versus two in patients with bare-metal stents (P=0.028). The 4-year rates of target-lesion revascularization were markedly reduced in both the sirolimus-stent group and the paclitaxel-stent group, as compared with the bare-metal–stent groups. The rates of death or myocardial infarction did not differ significantly between the groups with drug-eluting stents and those with bare-metal stents.

Conclusions Stent thrombosis after 1 year was more common with both sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents than with bare-metal stents. Both drug-eluting stents were associated with a marked reduction in target-lesion revascularization. There were no significant differences in the cumulative rates of death or myocardial infarction at 4 years.


Source Information

From Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York (G.W.S., J.W.M., A.J.K., M.F., R.M., M.B.L.); Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.G.E.); Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center, Hamburg, Germany (J.S.); Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom (K.D.D.); Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France (M.-C.M.); San Raffaele Hospital, Milan (A.C.); Hôpital du Sacre-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal (E.S.); Heart Center Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany (E.G.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston (D.E.C.); and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London (S.J.P.).

This article (10.1056/NEJMoa067193) was published at www.nejm.org on February 12, 2007.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Stone at Columbia University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 111 E. 59th St., 11th Fl., New York, NY 10022, or at gs2184{at}columbia.edu.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.