The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 356:1099-1109 March 15, 2007 Number 11
NextNext

Weekend versus Weekday Admission and Mortality from Myocardial Infarction
William J. Kostis, Ph.D., Kitaw Demissie, M.D., Ph.D., Stephen W. Marcella, M.D., M.P.H., Yu-Hsuan Shao, M.H.S., Alan C. Wilson, Ph.D., Abel E. Moreyra, M.D., for the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS 10) Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-Audio IconAudio Interview

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Redelmeier, D. A.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Management of acute myocardial infarction requires urgent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, which may not be uniformly available throughout the week.

Methods We examined differences in mortality between patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays for a first acute myocardial infarction, using the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System. All such admissions in New Jersey from 1987 to 2002 (231,164) were included and grouped in 4-year intervals.

Results There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, or infarction site between patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays. However, patients admitted on weekends were less likely to undergo invasive cardiac procedures, especially on the first and second days of hospitalization (P<0.001). In the interval from 1999 to 2002 (59,786 admissions), mortality at 30 days was significantly higher for patients admitted on weekends (12.9% vs. 12.0%, P=0.006). The difference became significant the day after admission (3.3% vs. 2.7%, P<0.001) and persisted at 1 year (1% absolute difference in mortality). The difference in mortality at 30 days remained significant after adjustment for demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, and site of infarction (hazard ratio, 1.048; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.022 to 1.076; P<0.001), but it became nonsignificant after additional adjustment for invasive cardiac procedures (hazard ratio, 1.023; 95% CI, 0.997 to 1.049; P=0.09).

Conclusions For patients with myocardial infarction, admission on weekends is associated with higher mortality and lower use of invasive cardiac procedures. Our findings suggest that the higher mortality on weekends is mediated in part by the lower rate of invasive procedures, and we speculate that better access to care on weekends could improve the outcome for patients with acute myocardial infarction.


Source Information

From the Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ (W.J.K., Y.-H. S., A.C.W., A.E.M.); and the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick (K.D., S.W.M.).

An interview with Dr. Thomas Lee on increased mortality with weekend admissions can be heard at www.nejm.org.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Kostis at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 1 Robert Wood Johnson Pl., P.O. Box 19, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019, or at kostiswj{at}umdnj.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Weekend Admission for Myocardial Infarction
Silber J. H., Altszuler H., Fitzgerald S. P., Ljung R., Köster M., Janszky I., Becker D. J., Kostis W. J., Demissie K., Moreyra A. E.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2007; 357:85-88, Jul 5, 2007. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.