The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 357:2562-2575 December 20, 2007 Number 25
NextNext

Reduced Exposure to Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplantation
Henrik Ekberg, M.D., Ph.D., Helio Tedesco-Silva, M.D., Alper Demirbas, M.D., Stefan Vítko, M.D., Björn Nashan, M.D., Ph.D., Alp Gürkan, M.D., F.A.C.S., Raimund Margreiter, M.D., Christian Hugo, M.D., Josep M. Grinyó, M.D., Ulrich Frei, M.D., Yves Vanrenterghem, M.D., Ph.D., Pierre Daloze, M.D., Philip F. Halloran, M.D., Ph.D., for the ELITE–Symphony Study

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Leichtman, A. B.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Immunosuppressive regimens with the fewest possible toxic effects are desirable for transplant recipients. This study evaluated the efficacy and relative toxic effects of four immunosuppressive regimens.

Methods We randomly assigned 1645 renal-transplant recipients to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids, or daclizumab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus, or low-dose sirolimus. The primary end point was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as calculated by the Cockcroft–Gault formula, 12 months after transplantation. Secondary end points included acute rejection and allograft survival.

Results The mean calculated GFR was higher in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (65.4 ml per minute) than in the other three groups (range, 56.7 to 59.4 ml per minute). The rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (12.3%) than in those receiving standard-dose cyclosporine (25.8%), low-dose cyclosporine (24.0%), or low-dose sirolimus (37.2%). Allograft survival differed significantly among the four groups (P=0.02) and was highest in the low-dose tacrolimus group (94.2%), followed by the low-dose cyclosporine group (93.1%), the standard-dose cyclosporine group (89.3%), and the low-dose sirolimus group (89.3%). Serious adverse events were more common in the low-dose sirolimus group than in the other groups (53.2% vs. a range of 43.4 to 44.3%), although a similar proportion of patients in each group had at least one adverse event during treatment (86.3 to 90.5%).

Conclusions A regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose tacrolimus may be advantageous for renal function, allograft survival, and acute rejection rates, as compared with regimens containing daclizumab induction plus either low-dose cyclosporine or low-dose sirolimus or with standard-dose cyclosporine without induction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00231764 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)


Source Information

From Lund University, Malmö, Sweden (H.E.); Federal University, São Paulo (H.T.-S.); Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey (A.D.); Institutu Klinické a Experimentální Medicíny, Prague, Czech Republic (S.V.); Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany (B.N.); S.B. Tepecik Hospital, Izmir, Turkey (A.G.); Universitaetsklinik, Innsbruck, Austria (R.M.); University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany (C.H.); Ciutat Universitaria de Bellvitge, Barcelona (J.M.G.); Charité, Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin (U.F.); Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Y.V.); Notre-Dame Hospital, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (P.D.); and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (P.F.H.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Ekberg at the Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital, 205 03 Malmö, Sweden, or at henrik.ekberg{at}med.lu.se.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.