The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 358:375-383 January 24, 2008 Number 4
NextNext

Effect of Cost Sharing on Screening Mammography in Medicare Health Plans
Amal N. Trivedi, M.D., M.P.H., William Rakowski, Ph.D., and John Z. Ayanian, M.D., M.P.P.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Bach, P. B.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
ABSTRACT

Background Policies that increase patients' share of health care expenses decrease the use of discretionary health services but also may reduce the use of important preventive care such as mammography.

Methods We reviewed coverage for mammography within 174 Medicare managed-care plans from 2001 through 2004. Among 550,082 individual-level observations for 366,475 women between the ages of 65 and 69 years, we compared rates of biennial breast-cancer screening in plans requiring cost sharing for mammography with screening rates in plans with full coverage. We also performed a longitudinal analysis of screening rates in plans that changed from full coverage to cost sharing for mammography as compared with rates in matched control plans that did not institute cost sharing.

Results The number of plans with cost sharing for mammography, which we defined as requiring a copayment of more than $10 or coinsurance of more than 10% for screening mammography, increased from 3 in 2001 (representing 0.5% of women) to 21 in 2004 (11.4% of women). Biennial screening rates were 8.3 percentage points lower in cost-sharing plans than in plans with full coverage, a difference that persisted in adjusted analyses (P<0.001). The effect of cost sharing was magnified among women residing in areas of lower income or educational levels (P<0.001 for each interaction). Screening rates decreased by 5.5 percentage points in plans that instituted cost sharing and increased by 3.4 percentage points in matched control plans that retained full coverage (P<0.001 for the adjusted analysis).

Conclusions Relatively small copayments were associated with significantly lower mammography rates among women who should undergo screening mammography according to accepted clinical guidelines. For effective preventive services such as mammography, exempting elderly adults from cost sharing may be warranted.


Source Information

From the Department of Community Health, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University (A.N.T., W.R.), and the Target Research Enhancement Program, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center (A.N.T.) — both in Providence, RI; and the Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School; and the Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health — all in Boston (J.Z.A.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Trivedi at the Department of Community Health, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Box G-S121, Providence, RI 02912, or at amal_trivedi{at}brown.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Effect of Cost Sharing on Screening Mammography
Dhalla I. A., Kiran T., Golden H. E., Trivedi A. N., Rakowski W., Ayanian J. Z.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2008; 358:2411-2412, May 29, 2008. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.