Accuracy of CT Colonography for Detection of Large Adenomas and Cancers
C. Daniel Johnson, M.D., M.M.M., Mei-Hsiu Chen, Ph.D., Alicia Y. Toledano, Sc.D., Jay P. Heiken, M.D., Abraham Dachman, M.D., Mark D. Kuo, M.D., Christine O. Menias, M.D., Betina Siewert, M.D., Jugesh I. Cheema, M.D., Richard G. Obregon, M.D., Jeff L. Fidler, M.D., Peter Zimmerman, M.D., Karen M. Horton, M.D., Kevin Coakley, M.D., Revathy B. Iyer, M.D., Amy K. Hara, M.D., Robert A. Halvorsen, Jr., M.D., Giovanna Casola, M.D., Judy Yee, M.D., Benjamin A. Herman, S.M., Lawrence J. Burgart, M.D., and Paul J. Limburg, M.D., M.P.H.
Background Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a noninvasiveoption in screening for colorectal cancer. However, its accuracyas a screening tool in asymptomatic adults has not been welldefined.
Methods We recruited 2600 asymptomatic study participants, 50years of age or older, at 15 study centers. CT colonographicimages were acquired with the use of standard bowel preparation,stool and fluid tagging, mechanical insufflation, and multidetector-rowCT scanners (with 16 or more rows). Radiologists trained inCT colonography reported all lesions measuring 5 mm or morein diameter. Optical colonoscopy and histologic review wereperformed according to established clinical protocols at eachcenter and served as the reference standard. The primary endpoint was detection by CT colonography of histologically confirmedlarge adenomas and adenocarcinomas (10 mm in diameter or larger)that had been detected by colonoscopy; detection of smallercolorectal lesions (6 to 9 mm in diameter) was also evaluated.
Results Complete data were available for 2531 participants (97%).For large adenomas and cancers, the mean (±SE) per-patientestimates of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negativepredictive values, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristiccurve for CT colonography were 0.90±0.03, 0.86±0.02,0.23±0.02, 0.99±<0.01, and 0.89±0.02,respectively. The sensitivity of 0.90 (i.e., 90%) indicatesthat CT colonography failed to detect a lesion measuring 10mm or more in diameter in 10% of patients. The per-polyp sensitivityfor large adenomas or cancers was 0.84±0.04. The per-patientsensitivity for detecting adenomas that were 6 mm or more indiameter was 0.78.
Conclusions In this study of asymptomatic adults, CT colonographicscreening identified 90% of subjects with adenomas or cancersmeasuring 10 mm or more in diameter. These findings augmentpublished data on the role of CT colonography in screening patientswith an average risk of colorectal cancer. (ClinicalTrials.govnumber, NCT00084929
[ClinicalTrials.gov]
; American College of Radiology Imaging Network[ACRIN] number, 6664.)
Source Information
From Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ (C.D.J., A.K.H.); Brown University Center for Statistical Sciences, Providence, RI (M.-H.C., B.A.H.); Biostatistics Consulting, Toronto (A.Y.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis (J.P.H., C.O.M.); University of Chicago, Chicago (A.D.); Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Scottsdale, AZ (M.D.K.); Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (B.S.); Yale University, New Haven, CT (J.I.C.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Denver (R.G.O.); Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN (J.L.F., P.J.L.); University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (P.Z.); Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (K.M.H.); Memorial Medical Center, Springfield, IL (K.C.); University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.B.I.); Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (R.A.H.); University of California, San Diego, San Diego (G.C.); University of California and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco (J.Y.); and Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis (L.J.B.).
Johnson, C. D.
(2009). CT Colonography: Coming of Age. Am. J. Roentgenol.
193: 1239-1242
[Abstract][Full Text]
Duncan, J. E., McNally, M. P., Sweeney, W. B., Gentry, A. B., Barlow, D. S., Jensen, D. W., Cash, B. D.
(2009). CT Colonography Predictably Overestimates Colonic Length and Distance to Polyps Compared With Optical Colonoscopy. Am. J. Roentgenol.
193: 1291-1295
[Abstract][Full Text]
Summers, R. M., Swift, J. A., Dwyer, A. J., Choi, J. R., Pickhardt, P. J.
(2009). Normalized Distance Along the Colon Centerline: A Method for Correlating Polyp Location on CT Colonography and Optical Colonoscopy. Am. J. Roentgenol.
193: 1296-1304
[Abstract][Full Text]
Summers, R. M., Liu, J., Yao, J., Brown, L., Choi, J. R., Pickhardt, P. J.
(2009). Automated Measurement of Colorectal Polyp Height at CT Colonography: Hyperplastic Polyps Are Flatter Than Adenomatous Polyps. Am. J. Roentgenol.
193: 1305-1310
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rutter, C. M., Kuntz, K. M., Zauber, A. G., the Colorectal Cancer Modeling Group in the Cancer,
(2009). Extracolonic Findings From CTC: Balancing Risks and Benefits. Am. J. Roentgenol.
193: W470-W470
[Full Text]
Pickhardt, P. J., Hassan, C., Kim, D. H.
(2009). Reply. Am. J. Roentgenol.
193: W471-W471
[Full Text]
Lieberman, D. A.
(2009). Screening for Colorectal Cancer. NEJM
361: 1179-1187
[Full Text]
McCollough, C. H., Guimaraes, L., Fletcher, J. G.
(2009). In Defense of Body CT. Am. J. Roentgenol.
193: 28-39
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pickhardt, P. J., Kim, D. H.
(2009). Colorectal Cancer Screening With CT Colonography: Key Concepts Regarding Polyp Prevalence, Size, Histology, Morphology, and Natural History. Am. J. Roentgenol.
193: 40-46
[Abstract][Full Text]
Park, S. H., Kim, S. Y., Lee, S. S., Bogoni, L., Kim, A. Y., Yang, S.-K., Myung, S.-J., Byeon, J.-S., Ye, B. D., Ha, H. K.
(2009). Sensitivity of CT Colonography for Nonpolypoid Colorectal Lesions Interpreted by Human Readers and With Computer-Aided Detection. Am. J. Roentgenol.
193: 70-78
[Abstract][Full Text]
Regge, D., Laudi, C., Galatola, G., Della Monica, P., Bonelli, L., Angelelli, G., Asnaghi, R., Barbaro, B., Bartolozzi, C., Bielen, D., Boni, L., Borghi, C., Bruzzi, P., Cassinis, M. C., Galia, M., Gallo, T. M., Grasso, A., Hassan, C., Laghi, A., Martina, M. C., Neri, E., Senore, C., Simonetti, G., Venturini, S., Gandini, G.
(2009). Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Individuals at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer. JAMA
301: 2453-2461
[Abstract][Full Text]
Roy, H. K., Turzhitsky, V., Kim, Y., Goldberg, M. J., Watson, P., Rogers, J. D., Gomes, A. J., Kromine, A., Brand, R. E., Jameel, M., Bogovejic, A., Pradhan, P., Backman, V.
(2009). Association between Rectal Optical Signatures and Colonic Neoplasia: Potential Applications for Screening. Cancer Res.
69: 4476-4483
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pickhardt, P. J., Hassan, C., Laghi, A., Kim, D. H.
(2009). CT Colonography to Screen for Colorectal Cancer and Aortic Aneurysm in the Medicare Population: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Am. J. Roentgenol.
192: 1332-1340
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gomes, A. J., Roy, H. K., Turzhitsky, V., Kim, Y., Rogers, J. D., Ruderman, S., Stoyneva, V., Goldberg, M. J., Bianchi, L. K., Yen, E., Kromine, A., Jameel, M., Backman, V.
(2009). Rectal Mucosal Microvascular Blood Supply Increase Is Associated with Colonic Neoplasia. Clin. Cancer Res.
15: 3110-3117
[Abstract][Full Text]
Regge, D., Hassan, C., Pickhardt, P. J., Laghi, A., Zullo, A., Kim, D. H., Iafrate, F., Morini, S.
(2009). Impact of Computer-aided Detection on the Cost-effectiveness of CT Colonography. Radiology
250: 488-497
[Abstract][Full Text]
Smith, R. A., Cokkinides, V., Brawley, O. W.
(2009). Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin
59: 27-41
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rockey, D. C., Gupta, S., Matuchansky, C., Sutradhar, R., Paszat, L., Rabeneck, L., Johnson, C. D., Chen, M.-H., Toledano, A. Y.
(2008). Accuracy of CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening. NEJM
359: 2842-2844
[Full Text]
Whitlock, E. P., Lin, J. S., Liles, E., Beil, T. L., Fu, R.
(2008). Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Targeted, Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. ANN INTERN MED
149: 638-658
[Abstract][Full Text]
(2008). Another Look at Screening with CT Colonography. JWatch General
2008: 2-2
[Full Text]
(2008). All you need to read in the other general journals. BMJ
337: a1760-a1760
[Full Text]
Fletcher, R. H.
(2008). Colorectal Cancer Screening on Stronger Footing. NEJM
359: 1285-1287
[Full Text]