Hardly a day goes by now without at least one story in a majornewspaper about the importance of controlling soaring healthcare costs. The issue is not just the magnitude of health carespending or the rate of increase. There is also increasing skepticismabout whether the American public is getting its money's worth,particularly from spending on new forms of technology. Despitethis concern, the public and the medical profession remain enamoredof the sometimes dazzling advances in medical technology. Thereis thus great reluctance to restrain the diffusion of expensivenew techniques in their early stages of . . . [Full Text of this Article]
References
Related Letters:
MRI Coronary Angiography
Bittl J. A., Paulin S., Manning W. J., Edelman R. R., Steinberg E. P.
Extract |
Full Text
N Engl J Med 1993;
329:507-508, Aug 12, 1993.
Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
Balk, E., Lau, J.
(2001). PET Scans and Technology Assessment: Deja Vu?. JAMA
285: 936-937
[Full Text]
Hunink, M. G.M., Kuntz, K. M., Fleischmann, K. E., Brady, T. J.
(1999). Noninvasive Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: Focusing the Development of New Diagnostic Technology. ANN INTERN MED
131: 673-680
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bittl, J. A., Paulin, S., Manning, W. J., Edelman, R. R., Steinberg, E. P.
(1993). MRI Coronary Angiography. NEJM
329: 507-508
[Full Text]
(1993). A NONINVASIVE METHOD OF IMAGING CORONARY ARTERIES. JWatch General
1993: 2-2
[Full Text]